Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB vs Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:18:12, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:07:31

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 4c 32GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image4.0
64.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm
rating-image3.6
69.6mm x 138.1mm x 7.8mm
Weightrating-image3.8
135.0g
rating-image3.9
132.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.9
5.2inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image4.4
485ppi
rating-image4.3
440ppi
Battery liferating-image2.9
2500.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3080.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image4.4
2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image3.0
1.8GHz+1.4GHz×6(6.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.5
4.0GB
rating-image3.0
3.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image3.4
64.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image1.8
6.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
5.0MP

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", performance comparison

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a width of 64.0mm, a length of 131.0mm, and a thickness of 9.3mm. Also, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a width of 69.6mm, a length of 138.1mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". For that reason, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a more compact size than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". For that reason the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a large size compared to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". For that reason the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". That's why we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB80/10064.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB72/10069.6mm x 138.1mm x 7.8mm

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is about 135.0g, and the weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is about 132.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB76/100135.0g
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB77/100132.0g

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a 5.2inch display. Also, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB77/1005.2inch
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB74/1005.0inch

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 1080 x 2280, and pixel density is 485ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB87/100485ppi
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB85/100440ppi

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is 3080.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB", with a 580mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is recommended over the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB57/1002500.0mAh
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB66/1003080.0mAh

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8992 Snapdragon 808, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×6(6.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB88/1002.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB60/1001.8GHz+1.4GHz×6(6.0-cores)

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB70/1004.0GB
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB60/1003.0GB

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB67/10064.0GB
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB55/10032.0GB

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a 6.0MP main camera. Also, "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is superior to the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB35/1006.0MP
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB61/10013.0MP

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB58/1008.0MP
Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB50/1005.0MP

"Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
ImageSharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
MakerSharpXiaomi
Release date2019-012015-09
ColorSmokey Green/Deep White/Pure BlackWhite/grey/pink/yellow/blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)64.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm69.6mm x 138.1mm x 7.8mm
Weight135.0g132.0g
Display size5.2inch5.0inch
Display typeIGZO IPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 22801080 x 1920
Pixel density485ppi440ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh3080.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845Qualcomm MSM8992 Snapdragon 808
CPU specs2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×6(6.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution6.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
Articles related to Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Articles related to Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
Articles related to Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB

Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB

New articles