Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB or Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2018-11-18 11:09:51, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:59:10

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBGalaxy J3 (2018) 16GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBGalaxy J3 (2018) 16GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBGalaxy J3 (2018) 16GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB

General rating:
Portabilityrating-image4.0
64.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm
rating-image3.5
70.1mm x 142.7mm x 8.9mm
Weightrating-image3.8
135.0g
rating-image3.5
152.0g
Size of screenrating-image3.9
5.2inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Screen clarityrating-image4.4
485ppi
rating-image3.0
293ppi
Battery durationrating-image2.9
2500.0mAh
rating-image3.0
2600.0mAh
Processing capabilityrating-image4.4
2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image2.0
1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.5
4.0GB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image3.4
64.0GB
rating-image2.5
16.0GB
Rear camera functionrating-image1.8
6.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front camera functionrating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
5.0MP

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 64.0mm wide, 131.0mm tall, and 9.3mm thick. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" is 70.1mm tall, 142.7mm wide, and 8.9mm thick.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is also more compact than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" in terms of the thickness of the devices. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is easier than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" to hold with one hand, and you are less likely to accidentally drop it. If you're looking for a smartphone that fits nicely in your hand and can be gripped firmly, we recommend buying the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

Comparing the width and height of the devices, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is more compact than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is easier to carry around than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" and easier to use with one hand. For a smartphone that is comfortable and easy to operate with one hand, and can fit neatly in your pocket or bag, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

Comparing the overall sizes, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is significantly smaller than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is more convenient than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" to use with one hand, and it is less likely to get in your way when not using it. If you prefer a smartphone that is easy to carry around and easy to use with one hand, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB80/10064.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB69/10070.1mm x 142.7mm x 8.9mm

Which one is easier to hold, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" weighs 135.0g. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" clocks in at 152.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a lighter phone than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 17g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" compared to the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". For this reason, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is recommended.

ScoreWeight
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB76/100135.0g
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB69/100152.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 5.2inch, and 5.0inch on the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". The screens of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDisplay size
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB77/1005.2inch
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB74/1005.0inch

Which one has a better display, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a 1080 x 2280 resolution and a pixel density of 485ppi. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 293ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", with a difference of about 192ppi. The screen on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB87/100485ppi
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB59/100293ppi

How is the battery duration of "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" different from that of "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh, while the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" has a 2600.0mAh battery. The batteries of both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" perform to the same extent. There is also no difference in the battery capacities of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". Since their battery life is practically identical, it would be better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreBattery capacity
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB57/1002500.0mAh
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB59/1002600.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 processor, and its performance speed is 2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" uses an Exynos 7570 Quad CPU that performs at a speed of 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB88/1002.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" different from "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 4.0GB of memory. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", on the other hand, has 2.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", with a difference of about 2GB. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB70/1004.0GB
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB50/1002.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 64.0GB of storage, while the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" has 16.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", with a difference of about 48GB. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB67/10064.0GB
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB50/10016.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 6.0MP. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB", with a difference of about 2MP. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" is more capable than the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB35/1006.0MP
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB50/1008.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

The forward-facing camera on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB"'s has 5.0MP. Comparing the front-facing camera performance, the number of pixels of the front-facing camera on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is higher than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. For this reason, it is possible to take higher quality selfies and make clear prints with the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" than the "Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB". Therefore, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is recommended.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB58/1008.0MP
Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB50/1005.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBGalaxy J3 (2018) 16GB
ImageSharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBGalaxy J3 (2018) 16GB
MakerSharpSamsung
Release date2019-012018-06
ColorSmokey Green/Deep White/Pure BlackBlack/Blue/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)64.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm70.1mm x 142.7mm x 8.9mm
Weight135.0g152.0g
Display size5.2inch5.0inch
Display typeIGZO IPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2280720 x 1280
Pixel density485ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh2600.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845Exynos 7570 Quad
CPU specs2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size64.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution6.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
Articles related to Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Articles related to Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
Articles related to Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB

Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy J3 (2018) 16GB

New articles