Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:16:45, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:21:52
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
- 1-8.How is "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" different from "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" different from that of "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is 74.2mm wide, 148.2mm tall, and 8.0mm thick. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is 73.8mm tall, 158.1mm wide, and 8.5mm thick.
There is no real difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
There is no real difference in length or width between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB"and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 64/100 | 74.2mm x 148.2mm x 8.0mm |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 63/100 | 73.8mm x 158.1mm x 8.5mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" weighs 165.0g. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" clocks in at 189.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is a lighter phone than the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", with a difference of approximately 24g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" compared to the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". For this reason, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is recommended.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 64/100 | 165.0g |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 54/100 | 189.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is 5.99inch, and 6.2inch on the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". The screens of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 89/100 | 5.99inch |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
Which one has a better display, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a 1080 x 2160 resolution and a pixel density of 403ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a pixel density of 530ppi. There is not much of a difference in the pixel resolutions of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", so they are about the same in terms of clarity of image and gentleness on the eyes. For this reason it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
- See screen clarity and pixel density ranking of all 5966 smartphone
- SHARP smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- AQUOS series smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- Samsung smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- Galaxy series smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 84/100 | 403ppi |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 88/100 | 530ppi |
How is the battery duration of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" different from that of "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2900.0mAh, while the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a 3500.0mAh battery. Regarding the battery performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a larger battery capacity than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB", with a difference of 600mAh. If you are choosing based on the battery, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is recommended over the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 63/100 | 2900.0mAh |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 processor, and its performance speed is 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" uses an Exynos 9810 CPU that performs at a speed of 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). There is also no real discrepancy between the CPU performances of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Because of this, both phones will feel practically identical in terms of smoothness when running apps and ease of game play. This is why it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 88/100 | 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 91/100 | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
How is "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" different from "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 4.0GB of memory. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", on the other hand, has 6.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB", with a difference of about 2GB. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of storage, while the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has 256.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB", with a difference of about 192GB. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has 12.0MP. The rear facing cameras of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" have roughly the same performance, so the quality of the photograph and video footage they can capture is around the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a resolution of 16.0MP. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"'s has 8.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", with a difference of about 8MP. Therefore, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" rather than the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Sharp | Samsung |
Release date | 2018-10 | 2018-03 |
Color | Black | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple/Burgundy Red/Sunrise Gold/Ice Blue/Polaris Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.2mm x 148.2mm x 8.0mm | 73.8mm x 158.1mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 165.0g | 189.0g |
Display size | 5.99inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2160 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 530ppi |
Battery capacity | 2900.0mAh | 3500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Exynos 9810 |
CPU specs | 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |