Compare Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB vs BLU Win JR LTE
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:23:22, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:28:23
How did the evaluations between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |||
General rating: | 67.7/100 (The 3505th of all smartphones) | 37.9/100 (The 2747th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 68/100 | 73/100 | ||
Weight | 74/100 | 75/100 | ||
Screen size | 82/100 | 66/100 | ||
Display quality | 85/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery life | 60/100 | 50/100 | ||
Processing power | 86/100 | 14/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 70/100 | 5/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 67/100 | 11/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 59/100 | 27/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", performance comparison
- 1-0."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", performance comparison
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a width of 72.0mm, a length of 141.8mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "BLU Win JR LTE" has a width of 67.5mm, a length of 133.0mm, and a thickness of 9.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BLU Win JR LTE" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". For that reason, the "BLU Win JR LTE" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". For that reason, we recommend the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BLU Win JR LTE" is a more compact size than the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". For that reason the "BLU Win JR LTE" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "BLU Win JR LTE" has a large size compared to the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". For that reason the "BLU Win JR LTE" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". That's why we recommend the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 68/100 | 72.0mm x 141.8mm x 7.9mm |
BLU Win JR LTE | 73/100 | 67.5mm x 133.0mm x 9.5mm |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is about 140.0g, and the weight of the "BLU Win JR LTE" is about 138.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 74/100 | 140.0g |
BLU Win JR LTE | 75/100 | 138.0g |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "BLU Win JR LTE" has a 4.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "BLU Win JR LTE", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "BLU Win JR LTE" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
BLU Win JR LTE | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 1080 x 2040, and pixel density is 419ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BLU Win JR LTE" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 217ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU Win JR LTE", with a difference of roughly 202ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "BLU Win JR LTE". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 85/100 | 419ppi |
BLU Win JR LTE | 35/100 | 217ppi |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 2700.0mAh, and the "BLU Win JR LTE" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BLU Win JR LTE", with a 700mAh difference. Since the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "BLU Win JR LTE", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 60/100 | 2700.0mAh |
BLU Win JR LTE | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630, with performance measured at 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "BLU Win JR LTE"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "BLU Win JR LTE". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "BLU Win JR LTE". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 86/100 | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
BLU Win JR LTE | 14/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "BLU Win JR LTE" is 512.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "BLU Win JR LTE", with a difference of about 508GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "BLU Win JR LTE". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
BLU Win JR LTE | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "BLU Win JR LTE" is 4.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "BLU Win JR LTE", with a roughly 60GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "BLU Win JR LTE". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
BLU Win JR LTE | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "BLU Win JR LTE" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BLU Win JR LTE", with a roughly 7MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "BLU Win JR LTE". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
BLU Win JR LTE | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
BLU Win JR LTE | - /100 |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", performance comparison by specification sheet
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
Image | ||
Maker | Sharp | BLU |
Release date | 2018-07 | 2015-04 |
Color | Black | Grey/White/Orange/Yellow/Pink |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 141.8mm x 7.9mm | 67.5mm x 133.0mm x 9.5mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 138.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2040 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 419ppi | 217ppi |
Battery capacity | 2700.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |