Wiko View Max 32GB vs vivo X5 (2014) 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:34:52, Updated date: 2020-04-16 23:17:22
How did the evaluations between the "Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Wiko View Max 32GB | vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 54.8/100 (The 3842th of all smartphones) | 53.5/100 (The 2319th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 61/100 | 72/100 | ||
Weight | 67/100 | 73/100 | ||
Screen size | 89/100 | 74/100 | ||
Display quality | 53/100 | 59/100 | ||
Battery life | 80/100 | 53/100 | ||
Processing power | 50/100 | 53/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 50/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", performance comparison
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Wiko View Max 32GB" has a width of 75.8mm, a length of 157.8mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a width of 71.1mm, a length of 143.3mm, and a thickness of 6.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Wiko View Max 32GB". The "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" excels over the "Wiko View Max 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" over the "Wiko View Max 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "Wiko View Max 32GB". For that reason the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a large size compared to the "Wiko View Max 32GB". For that reason the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Wiko View Max 32GB". That's why we recommend the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 61/100 | 75.8mm x 157.8mm x 7.9mm |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 72/100 | 71.1mm x 143.3mm x 6.3mm |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Wiko View Max 32GB" is about 158.0g, and the weight of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is about 141.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Wiko View Max 32GB", with a difference of about 17g. For that reason the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Wiko View Max 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" over the "Wiko View Max 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 67/100 | 158.0g |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 73/100 | 141.0g |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Wiko View Max 32GB" has a 5.99inch display. Also, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 0.99inch. The "Wiko View Max 32GB" is superior to the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Wiko View Max 32GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Wiko View Max 32GB" over the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 89/100 | 5.99inch |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Wiko View Max 32GB" is 720 x 1440, and pixel density is 268ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a higher pixel density than the "Wiko View Max 32GB", with a difference of roughly 25ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" have better picture quality than on the "Wiko View Max 32GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 53/100 | 268ppi |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Wiko View Max 32GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is 2250.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", with a 1750mAh difference. Since the "Wiko View Max 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Wiko View Max 32GB" over the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 53/100 | 2250.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Wiko View Max 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6739WA, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Wiko View Max 32GB" and the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 50/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 53/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Wiko View Max 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" is superior to the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Wiko View Max 32GB" over the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Wiko View Max 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko View Max 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Wiko View Max 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Wiko View Max 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Wiko View Max 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Wiko View Max 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko View Max 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Wiko View Max 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Wiko View Max 32GB" and "vivo X5 (2014) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Wiko View Max 32GB | vivo X5 (2014) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Wiko | vivo |
Color | Anthracite/Gold/Black | White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.8mm x 157.8mm x 7.9mm | 71.1mm x 143.3mm x 6.3mm |
Weight | 158.0g | 141.0g |
Display size | 5.99inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2250.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6739WA | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |