Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB vs AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:18:07, Updated date: 2020-04-15 14:35:06

XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GBAQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GBAQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GBAQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB

AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.3
72.0mm x 145.5mm x 8.6mm
rating-image3.9
65.0mm x 128.0mm x 9.8mm
Weightrating-image
rating-image3.8
137.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.7
5.0inch
rating-image3.3
4.5inch
Display qualityrating-image3.0
293ppi
rating-image3.4
326ppi
Battery liferating-image2.9
2500.0mAh
rating-image1.8
1520.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image1
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image1
1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image1.0
1.0GB
rating-image1.0
1.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image1.2
8.0GB
rating-image1
4.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image3.0
12.1MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.5
5.0MP
rating-image1
0.3MP

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", performance comparison

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has a width of 72.0mm, a length of 145.5mm, and a thickness of 8.6mm. Also, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" has a width of 65.0mm, a length of 128.0mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB". The "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" excels over the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" over the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB". The "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" excels over the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" over the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is a considerably larger size than the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is superior to the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" over the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB66/10072.0mm x 145.5mm x 8.6mm
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB77/10065.0mm x 128.0mm x 9.8mm

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

ScoreWeight
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB - /100
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB75/100137.0g

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" has a 4.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has a larger screen compared to the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" than on the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB".

ScoreDisplay size
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB74/1005.0inch
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB66/1004.5inch

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 326ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" has a higher pixel density than the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 33ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" have better picture quality than on the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB".

ScorePixel density
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB59/100293ppi
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB67/100326ppi

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is 1520.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has greater battery capacity than the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", with a 980mAh difference. Since the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB57/1002500.0mAh
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB35/1001520.0mAh

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB"'s CPU is a Spreadtrum SC9832A, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB"'s CPU is a OMAP4430, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has considerably higher specs than the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB".

ScoreCPU specs
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB4/1001.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB20/1001.0GB
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB20/1001.0GB

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is 4.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", with a roughly 4GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB".

ScoreStorage size
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB24/1008.0GB
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB11/1004.0GB

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" has a 12.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" has a higher pixel count than the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 4.1MP difference. As a result, the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB50/1008.0MP
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB59/10012.1MP

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" has an 0.3MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", with a roughly 4.7MP difference. As a result, the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" is more suited than the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB50/1005.0MP
AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB0/1000.3MP

"XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB" and "AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GBAQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB
ImageXOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GBAQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB
MakerXOLO
Release date2016-092012-07-12
ColorBlack/Brown+Gold/ /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.0mm x 145.5mm x 8.6mm65.0mm x 128.0mm x 9.8mm
Display size5.0inch4.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDNEW ASV
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi326ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh1520.0mAh
ChipsetSpreadtrum SC9832AOMAP4430
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP12.1MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP0.3MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB
Articles related to AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB

XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB

Articles related to XOLO Era 1X (2016) 8GB
Articles related to AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB

AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as AQUOS PHONE 102SH II SoftBank 4GB

New articles