Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB vs vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 10:20:07, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:09:05
How did the evaluations between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has a width of 97.0mm, a length of 186.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 162.0mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". The "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" excels over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". The "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" excels over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 43/100 | 97.0mm x 186.0mm x 8.9mm |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 59/100 | 77.0mm x 162.0mm x 8.0mm |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is about 250.0g, and the weight of the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is about 199.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB", with a difference of about 51g. For that reason the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 42/100 | 250.0g |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 50/100 | 199.0g |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has a 6.98inch display. Also, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a 6.59inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 91/100 | 6.98inch |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 90/100 | 6.59inch |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 210ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 1080 x 2316, and pixel density is 387ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 177ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 31/100 | 210ppi |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 81/100 | 387ppi |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is 4250.0mAh, and the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 4000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 80/100 | 4250.0mAh |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.7GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 14/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 94/100 | 2.7GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 8.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB", with a difference of about 7GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB | vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Lenovo | vivo |
Release date | 2015-10 | 2018-06 |
Color | Tuxedo Black/Polar White/Aqua Blue/Cherry Red | Black/Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 97.0mm x 186.0mm x 8.9mm | 77.0mm x 162.0mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 250.0g | 199.0g |
Display size | 6.98inch | 6.59inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 2316 |
Pixel density | 210ppi | 387ppi |
Battery capacity | 4250.0mAh | 4000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 8.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |