Should you buy TECNO Camon CX 32GB or TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-12-13 09:07:44, Updated date: 2020-04-15 20:04:15
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
- 1-8.How is "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" different from "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" different from that of "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is 75.8mm wide, 152.8mm tall, and 5.6mm thick. The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" is 76.4mm tall, 153.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick.
Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". For this reason, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is recommended.
There is no real difference in length or width between the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB"and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 65/100 | 75.8mm x 152.8mm x 5.6mm |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 60/100 | 76.4mm x 153.0mm x 7.9mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" weighs 150.0g. The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" clocks in at 169.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is a lighter phone than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 19g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" compared to the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". For this reason, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 70/100 | 150.0g |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 62/100 | 169.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is 5.5inch, and 5.5inch on the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". The screens of the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
Which one has a better display, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a 1080 x 1920 resolution and a pixel density of 400ppi. The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 267ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 133ppi. The screen on the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" rather than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 85/100 | 400ppi |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
How is the battery duration of "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" different from that of "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3200.0mAh, while the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" has a 3000.0mAh battery. The batteries of both the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" perform to the same extent. There is also no difference in the battery capacities of the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Since their battery life is practically identical, it would be better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 68/100 | 3200.0mAh |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is equipped with a Mediatek MT6750T processor, and its performance speed is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" uses an Mediatek MT6580 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has significantly higher specs than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" proves to be more advanced than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" rather than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 61/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 36/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
How is "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" different from "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has 3.0GB of memory. The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", on the other hand, has 2.0GB. As for memory performance, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" rather than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB. Comparing the ROM and storage capacity, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a larger storage capacity compared to the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 16GB. Consequently, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" can take more photos and videos than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" and it is possible to install more applications on it. For this reason, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" and "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has 16.0MP. The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is higher than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. As a result, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". Therefore, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" or "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a resolution of 16.0MP. The "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB"'s has 5.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 11MP. Therefore, the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "TECNO Camon CX 32GB" rather than the "TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
TECNO Camon CX 32GB | TECNO Spark (2017) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | TECNO | TECNO |
Release date | 2017-03 | 2017-06 |
Color | Grey/Rose Golden/Golden/Blue | Champagne Gold/Black/Coral Blue/Metallic Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.8mm x 152.8mm x 5.6mm | 76.4mm x 153.0mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 150.0g | 169.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 3200.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6750T | Mediatek MT6580 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |