Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB or Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2018-12-16 00:19:46, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:59:00

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image2.3
86.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm
rating-image3.4
71.4mm x 143.4mm x 8.5mm
Weightrating-image1
469.0g
rating-image3.7
140.0g
Screen sizerating-image4.1
5.5inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image4.3
400ppi
rating-image3.0
293ppi
Battery liferating-image4.8
9000.0mAh
rating-image3.0
2630.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image3.1
1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image2.0
1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
3.0GB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image2.5
16.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.4
16.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.9
8.0MP

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a width of 86.5mm, a length of 168.8mm, and a thickness of 15.9mm. Also, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 71.4mm, a length of 143.4mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" excels over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" excels over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB45/10086.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB68/10071.4mm x 143.4mm x 8.5mm

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is about 469.0g, and the weight of the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is about 140.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB", and there is a difference of about 329g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".

ScoreWeight
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB10/100469.0g
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB74/100140.0g

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" than on the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB82/1005.5inch
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 107ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB85/100400ppi
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB59/100293ppi

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 9000.0mAh, and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 2630.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a 6370mAh difference. Since the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB95/1009000.0mAh
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB59/1002630.0mAh

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6750, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6737, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB61/1001.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB60/1003.0GB
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB55/10032.0GB
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB68/10016.0MP
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB50/1008.0MP

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB58/1008.0MP
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB58/1008.0MP

"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
ImageYezz Epic T (2018) 32GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
MakerYezzNokia
Release date2018-042017-06
ColorBlackSilver White/Matte Black/Tempered Blue/Copper White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)86.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm71.4mm x 143.4mm x 8.5mm
Weight469.0g140.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density400ppi293ppi
Battery capacity9000.0mAh2630.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6750Mediatek MT6737
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB
Articles related to Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Articles related to Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB
Articles related to Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

New articles