Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB vs HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-12-15 23:48:47, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:13:02
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", performance comparison
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a width of 86.5mm, a length of 168.8mm, and a thickness of 15.9mm. Also, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has a width of 72.0mm, a length of 151.0mm, and a thickness of 9.6mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" excels over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is a more compact size than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". For that reason the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 45/100 | 86.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 65/100 | 72.0mm x 151.0mm x 9.6mm |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is about 469.0g, and the weight of the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is about 168.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB", and there is a difference of about 301g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 10/100 | 469.0g |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 63/100 | 168.0g |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Also, the resolution on the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 564ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 85/100 | 400ppi |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 89/100 | 564ppi |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 9000.0mAh, and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is 2840.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", with a 6160mAh difference. Since the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 95/100 | 9000.0mAh |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 62/100 | 2840.0mAh |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6750, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6795T Helio X10, with performance measured at 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" over the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 61/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 88/100 | 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has a 20.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB", with a roughly 4MP difference. As a result, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 78/100 | 20.0MP |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has an 4.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", with a roughly 4MP difference. As a result, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is more suited than the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | 38/100 | 4.0MP |
"Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB | HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Yezz | HTC |
Release date | 2018-04 | 2015-05 |
Color | Black | Gunmetal Gray/Silver Gold/Amber Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 86.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm | 72.0mm x 151.0mm x 9.6mm |
Weight | 469.0g | 168.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super LCD3 |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 564ppi |
Battery capacity | 9000.0mAh | 2840.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6750 | Mediatek MT6795T Helio X10 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 20.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 4.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |