Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB vs Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB
Created date: 2019-03-19 05:28:13, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:07:01
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | |||
General rating: | 77.3/100 (The 3128th of all smartphones) | 72.4/100 (The 35th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 62/100 | 59/100 | ||
Weight | 49/100 | 54/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 84/100 | 95/100 | ||
Battery life | 72/100 | 68/100 | ||
Processing power | 94/100 | 88/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 93/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 95/100 | 67/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 87/100 | 76/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 75/100 | 71/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", performance comparison
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a width of 75.1mm, a length of 157.3mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm. Also, the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 156.0mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 62/100 | 75.1mm x 157.3mm x 8.3mm |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 59/100 | 77.0mm x 156.0mm x 7.9mm |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is about 206.0g, and the weight of the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" is about 191.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 49/100 | 206.0g |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 54/100 | 191.0g |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a 6.39inch display. Also, the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", with a roughly 0.88inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" than on the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 90/100 | 6.39inch |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 403ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" is 2160 x 3840, and pixel density is 801ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB", with a difference of roughly 398ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" over the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 84/100 | 403ppi |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 95/100 | 801ppi |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is 3500.0mAh, and the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" is 3230.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 68/100 | 3230.0mAh |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB"'s CPU is a HiSilicon Kirin 980, with performance measured at 2.6GHz+1.92GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 835 MSM8998, with performance measured at 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has higher specs compared to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". For that reason, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" over the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 94/100 | 2.6GHz+1.92GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 88/100 | 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", with a difference of about 4GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is superior to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" over the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is 512.0GB. Also the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", with a roughly 448GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is superior to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" over the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 95/100 | 512.0GB |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a 24.0MP main camera. Also, "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" has a 19.2MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", with a roughly 4.8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" is superior to the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" over the "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 87/100 | 24.0MP |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 76/100 | 19.2MP |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" has an 13.2MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | 71/100 | 13.2MP |
"Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB" and "Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Honor Magic 2 3D 512GB | Xperia XZ Premium SO-04J docomo 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Honor | |
Release date | 2019-03 | 2017-06-16 |
Color | Gradient Black/Gradient Red/Gradient Blue | Deepsea Black/Luminous Chrome/Rosso |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.1mm x 157.3mm x 8.3mm | 77.0mm x 156.0mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 206.0g | 191.0g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | for mobile |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 2160 x 3840 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 801ppi |
Battery capacity | 3500.0mAh | 3230.0mAh |
Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 |
CPU specs | 2.6GHz+1.92GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 24.0MP | 19.2MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.2MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |