Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB vs Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-03-19 05:45:19, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:34:33
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | |||
General rating: | 78.8/100 (The 3069th of all smartphones) | 34.6/100 (The 914th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 63/100 | 78/100 | ||
Weight | 61/100 | 88/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 58/100 | ||
Display quality | 84/100 | 42/100 | ||
Battery life | 69/100 | 32/100 | ||
Processing power | 96/100 | 0/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 93/100 | 0/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 91/100 | 0/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 97/100 | 5/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 81/100 | 27/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", performance comparison
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a width of 74.7mm, a length of 157.5mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" has a width of 65.2mm, a length of 124.8mm, and a thickness of 9.2mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB". The "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" excels over the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB". The "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" excels over the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 63/100 | 74.7mm x 157.5mm x 7.6mm |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 78/100 | 65.2mm x 124.8mm x 9.2mm |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is about 173.0g, and the weight of the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is about 105.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB", and there is a difference of about 68g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 61/100 | 173.0g |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 88/100 | 105.0g |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a 6.39inch display. Also, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" has a 4.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a difference of approximately 2.38inch. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 90/100 | 6.39inch |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 58/100 | 4.0inch |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 403ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is 480 x 800, and pixel density is 233ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a difference of roughly 170ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 84/100 | 403ppi |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 42/100 | 233ppi |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is 3300.0mAh, and the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is 1400.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a 1900mAh difference. Since the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 69/100 | 3300.0mAh |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 32/100 | 1400.0mAh |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB"'s CPU is a RDA 8810P, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 96/100 | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 0/100 | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a difference of about 248GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a roughly 256GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a roughly 46MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 5/100 | 2.0MP |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has an 20.0MP front camera and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" has an 3.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", with a roughly 17MP difference. As a result, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is more suited than the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" over the "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | 81/100 | 20.0MP |
Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Celkon A407 (2015) 512MB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Xiaomi | Celkon |
Release date | 2019-03 | 2015-05 |
Color | Lavender Violet/Ocean Blue/Piano Black | Silver/White/Light Blue/Dark Blue/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.7mm x 157.5mm x 7.6mm | 65.2mm x 124.8mm x 9.2mm |
Weight | 173.0g | 105.0g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 3300.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | RDA 8810P |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 2.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |