Galaxy A20e vs Galaxy S10
Created date: 04/10/2019, 21:34:46, Updated date: 04/16/2020, 14:11:32
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Galaxy A20e | Galaxy S10 | |||
![]() Compare with another product | ![]() Compare with another product | |||
General rating: | 61/100 (The 571th of all smartphones) | 80.6/100 (The 47th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 71/100 | 71/100 | ||
Weight | 73/100 | 67/100 | ||
Screen size | 86/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 60/100 | 88/100 | ||
Battery life | 65/100 | 71/100 | ||
Processing power | 66/100 | 95/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 93/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 95/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 68/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 64/100 |
Contents
- 1.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, performance comparison
- 1-0.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10 size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10 rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which has a clearer display?
- 1-6.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which has more data storage?
- 1-8.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which has better CPU?
- 1-10.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2.Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, performance comparison
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10 size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The Galaxy A20e has a width of 2.7 inches (69.7 mm), a length of 5.8 inches (147.4 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (8.4 mm). Also, the Galaxy S10 has a width of 2.8 inches (70.4 mm), a length of 5.9 inches (149.9 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (7.8 mm).
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10 in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the Galaxy A20e and the Galaxy S10. For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the Galaxy A20e and the Galaxy S10. For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 71/100 | 2.7 inches (69.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.4 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm) |
Galaxy S10 | 71/100 | 2.8 inches (70.4 mm) x 5.9 inches (149.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) |
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the Galaxy A20e is about 141 oz (141 g), and the weight of the Galaxy S10 is about 157 oz (157 g). Comparing the weight of the two devices, the Galaxy A20e is a lighter smart phone than the Galaxy S10, with a difference of about 141 oz (16 g). For that reason the Galaxy A20e is a smart phone that is less likely than the Galaxy S10to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the Galaxy A20e over the Galaxy S10.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 73/100 | 141 oz (141 g) |
Galaxy S10 | 67/100 | 157 oz (157 g) |
Want to read it together
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The Galaxy A20e has a 5.8 inch display. Also, the Galaxy S10 has a 6.1 inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the Galaxy A20e and the Galaxy S10. As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 86/100 | 5.8 inch |
Galaxy S10 | 90/100 | 6.1 inch |
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the Galaxy A20e is 720 x 1560, and pixel density is 296 ppi. Also, the resolution on the Galaxy S10 is 1440 x 3040, and pixel density is 551 ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the Galaxy S10 has much higher pixel density than the Galaxy A20e, with a difference of roughly 255 ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the Galaxy S10 is superior to the Galaxy A20e. If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the Galaxy S10 over the Galaxy A20e.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 60/100 | 296 ppi |
Galaxy S10 | 88/100 | 551 ppi |
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The Galaxy A20e is 3000 mAh, and the Galaxy S10 is 3400 mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the Galaxy S10 has greater battery capacity than the Galaxy A20e, with a 400 mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the Galaxy S10 is recommended over the Galaxy A20e.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 65/100 | 3000 mAh |
Galaxy S10 | 71/100 | 3400 mAh |
Want to read it together
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The Galaxy A20e's CPU is a Exynos 7884, with performance measured at 1.6GHz+1.35GHz×8(OctaCore). Also, the Galaxy S10's CPU is a Exynos 9820, with performance measured at 2.73GHz+2.31GHz+1.95GHz×8(OctaCore). Comparing CPU performance, the Galaxy S10 has considerably higher specs than the Galaxy A20e. In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the Galaxy S10 is superior to the Galaxy A20e. If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the Galaxy S10 over the Galaxy A20e.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 66/100 | 1.6GHz+1.35GHz×8(OctaCore) |
Galaxy S10 | 95/100 | 2.73GHz+2.31GHz+1.95GHz×8(OctaCore) |
Want to read it together
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the Galaxy A20e is 3GB and the weight of the Galaxy S10 is 8GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the Galaxy S10 has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the Galaxy A20e, with a difference of about 5GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the Galaxy S10 is superior to the Galaxy A20e. If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the Galaxy S10 over the Galaxy A20e.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 60/100 | 3GB |
Galaxy S10 | 93/100 | 8GB |
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the Galaxy A20e is 32GB. Also the Galaxy S10 is 512GB. Regarding storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the Galaxy A20e, with a roughly 480GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the Galaxy S10 is superior to the Galaxy A20e. If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the Galaxy S10 over the Galaxy A20e.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 55/100 | 32GB |
Galaxy S10 | 95/100 | 512GB |
Want to read it together
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10 rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Galaxy A20e has a 13 MP main camera. Also, Galaxy S10 has a 16 MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the Galaxy S10 has a higher pixel count than the Galaxy A20e, with a roughly 3 MP difference. As a result, the Galaxy S10 is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the Galaxy A20e, and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the Galaxy S10.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 61/100 | 13 MP |
Galaxy S10 | 68/100 | 16 MP |
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Galaxy A20e has an 8 MP front camera and Galaxy S10 has an 10 MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the Galaxy S10 has a higher pixel count than the Galaxy A20e, with a roughly 2 MP difference. As a result, the Galaxy S10 is better able to take high quality selfies than the Galaxy A20e, and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the Galaxy S10.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A20e | 58/100 | 8 MP |
Galaxy S10 | 64/100 | 10 MP |
Want to read it together
Detailed comparison of Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10
Comparison for general rating
Image | Product name | Review | general rating | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 61.0 | Color:Black/White/Blue/Coral, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.4 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm), Weight:141 oz (141 g), Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1560, Pixel density:296 ppi, Display size:5.8 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 7884, CPU specs:1.6GHz+1.35GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:3GB, Storage size:32GB, Battery capacity:3000 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:13 MP, Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
![]() | 80.6 | Color:Prism White/Prism Black/Prism Green/Prism Blue/Canary Yellow/Flamingo Pink/Cardinal Red/Smoke Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.4 mm) x 5.9 inches (149.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm), Weight:157 oz (157 g), Display type:Dynamic AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 3040, Pixel density:551 ppi, Display size:6.1 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 9820, CPU specs:2.73GHz+2.31GHz+1.95GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB, Storage size:512GB, Battery capacity:3400 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:16 MP, Front-camera resolution:10 MP |
Comparison for body size
Image | Product name | Review | body size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 59.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.4 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm) | |||||
![]() | 58.4 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.4 mm) x 5.9 inches (149.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) |
Comparison for body weight
Image | Product name | Review | body weight | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 73.9 | Weight:141 oz (141 g) | |||||
![]() | 67.6 | Weight:157 oz (157 g) |
Comparison for screen size
Image | Product name | Review | screen size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 86.8 | Display size:5.8 inch | |||||
![]() | 90.2 | Display size:6.1 inch |
Comparison for screen resolution
Image | Product name | Review | screen resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 48.3 | ||||||
![]() | 93.6 |
Comparison for RAM capacity
Image | Product name | Review | RAM capacity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 60.0 | RAM size:3GB | |||||
![]() | 93.4 | RAM size:8GB |
Comparison for storage size
Image | Product name | Review | storage size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 55.5 | Storage size:32GB | |||||
![]() | 95.0 | Storage size:512GB |
Comparison for battery
Image | Product name | Review | battery | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 65.0 | Battery capacity:3000 mAh | |||||
![]() | 71.0 | Battery capacity:3400 mAh |
Comparison for rear-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | rear-camera resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | |||||
![]() | 68.8 | Rear-camera resolution:16 MP |
Comparison for front-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | front-camera resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 58.3 | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
![]() | 64.2 | Front-camera resolution:10 MP |
Comparison for grip
Image | Product name | Review | grip | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 66.5 | Color:Black/White/Blue/Coral, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.4 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm), Weight:141 oz (141 g) | |||||
![]() | 63.0 | Color:Prism White/Prism Black/Prism Green/Prism Blue/Canary Yellow/Flamingo Pink/Cardinal Red/Smoke Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.4 mm) x 5.9 inches (149.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm), Weight:157 oz (157 g) |
Comparison for screen cleanliness
Image | Product name | Review | screen cleanliness | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 60.6 | Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1560, Pixel density:296 ppi | |||||
![]() | 89.0 | Display type:Dynamic AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 3040, Pixel density:551 ppi |
Comparison for performance
Image | Product name | Review | performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 66.1 | OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 7884, CPU specs:1.6GHz+1.35GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:3GB | |||||
![]() | 95.7 | OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 9820, CPU specs:2.73GHz+2.31GHz+1.95GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB |
Galaxy A20e and Galaxy S10, performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy A20e | Galaxy S10 | |
Image | ![]() | ![]() |
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 5, 2019 | 3, 2019 |
Color | Black/White/Blue/Coral | Prism White/Prism Black/Prism Green/Prism Blue/Canary Yellow/Flamingo Pink/Cardinal Red/Smoke Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 2.7 inches (69.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.4 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm) | 2.8 inches (70.4 mm) x 5.9 inches (149.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) |
Weight | 141 oz (141 g) | 157 oz (157 g) |
Display size | 5.8 inch | 6.1 inch |
Display type | PLS TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1560 | 1440 x 3040 |
Pixel density | 296 ppi | 551 ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 7884 | Exynos 9820 |
CPU specs | 1.6GHz+1.35GHz×8(OctaCore) | 2.73GHz+2.31GHz+1.95GHz×8(OctaCore) |
RAM size | 3GB | 8GB |
Storage size | 32GB | 512GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8 MP | 10 MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |