Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB vs Philips I908 (2015) 16GB

Created date: 2019-05-03 04:37:09, Updated date: 2020-04-15 20:11:56

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBPhilips I908 (2015) 16GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBPhilips I908 (2015) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBPhilips I908 (2015) 16GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

Philips I908 (2015) 16GB

General rating:

79.4/100

(The 3050th of all smartphones)

60.3/100

(The 1263th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
53/100
70/100
Weight
47/100
67/100
Screen size
91/100
74/100
Display quality
81/100
85/100
Battery life
83/100
65/100
Processing power
98/100
66/100
Memory capacity
99/100
50/100
Storage capacity
91/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
97/100
61/100
Front camera performance
75/100
50/100

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a width of 78.5mm, a length of 171.7mm, and a thickness of 9.7mm. Also, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 143.0mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB". The "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" excels over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB". The "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" excels over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB53/10078.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB70/10070.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.8mm

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is about 215.0g, and the weight of the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is about 156.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB", and there is a difference of about 59g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB".

ScoreWeight
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB47/100215.0g
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB67/100156.0g

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a 6.65inch display. Also, the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1.65inch. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is superior to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB91/1006.65inch
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 387ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB81/100387ppi
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB85/100440ppi

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is 5000.0mAh, and the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", with a 2000mAh difference. Since the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB83/1005000.0mAh
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB65/1003000.0mAh

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is superior to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB98/1002.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB66/1001.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of about 10GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is superior to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB99/10012.0GB
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is superior to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB91/100256.0GB
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 35MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is superior to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB97/10048.0MP
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB61/10013.0MP

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 11MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is more suited than the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB75/10016.0MP
Philips I908 (2015) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "Philips I908 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBPhilips I908 (2015) 16GB
ImageZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBPhilips I908 (2015) 16GB
MakerZTEPhilips
Release date2019-052015-08
ColorBlack/Red/Camouflage/Red+BlueBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm70.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.8mm
Weight215.0g156.0g
Display size6.65inch5.0inch
Display typeAMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 23401080 x 1920
Pixel density387ppi440ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh3000.0mAh
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB2.0GB
Storage size256.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB
Articles related to Philips I908 (2015) 16GB

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

Articles related to ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB
Articles related to Philips I908 (2015) 16GB

Philips I908 (2015) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Philips I908 (2015) 16GB

New articles