Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB vs. ARROWS S EM01F 32GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2019-05-24 05:32:38, Updated date: 2020-04-15 22:02:54

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBARROWS S EM01F 32GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBARROWS S EM01F 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBARROWS S EM01F 32GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

ARROWS S EM01F 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.4
68/100
rating-image3.8
75/100
Weightrating-image3.4
67/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Screen sizerating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Display qualityrating-image3.0
60/100
rating-image3.2
64/100
Battery liferating-image3.0
59/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Processing powerrating-image2.8
55/100
rating-image2.1
42/100
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Storage capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
58/100
rating-image1
0/100

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 145.8mm, and a thickness of 9.6mm. Also, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a width of 65.0mm, a length of 129.0mm, and a thickness of 10.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". For that reason, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". The "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB68/10070.0mm x 145.8mm x 9.6mm
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB75/10065.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is about 157.0g, and the weight of the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is about 151.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB67/100157.0g
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB69/100151.0g

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a 5.45inch display. Also, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a 4.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a difference of approximately 0.75inch. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB81/1005.45inch
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB69/1004.7inch

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is 720 x 1440, and pixel density is 295ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 312ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB60/100295ppi
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB64/100312ppi

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 2420.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB59/1002600.0mAh
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB56/1002420.0mAh

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB"'s CPU is a Unisoc SC9863A, with performance measured at 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB55/1001.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB42/1001.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB50/1002.0GB
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB50/1002.0GB

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB50/10016.0GB
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB55/10032.0GB

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a 13.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB61/10013.0MP
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB61/10013.1MP

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has an 0.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is more suited than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB58/1008.0MP
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB0/1000.0MP

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBARROWS S EM01F 32GB
ImageZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBARROWS S EM01F 32GB
MakerZTE
Release date2019-052013-08-20
ColorBlack/Blue/
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.0mm x 145.8mm x 9.6mm65.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm
Weight157.0g151.0g
Display size5.45inch4.7inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440720 x 1280
Pixel density295ppi312ppi
Battery capacity2600.0mAh2420.0mAh
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863ASnapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064
CPU specs1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP0.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB
Articles related to ARROWS S EM01F 32GB

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Articles related to ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB
Articles related to ARROWS S EM01F 32GB

ARROWS S EM01F 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ARROWS S EM01F 32GB

New articles