Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB vs Wiko Upulse lite: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2019-06-13 04:28:32, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:17:29

Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GBWiko Upulse lite
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GBWiko Upulse lite

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GBWiko Upulse lite
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB

Wiko Upulse lite
General rating:

62.5/100

(The 3661th of all smartphones)

62/100

(The 1218th of all smartphones)

Portability
62/100
67/100
Weight
61/100
67/100
Size of screen
74/100
77/100
Screen clarity
59/100
57/100
Battery duration
62/100
65/100
Processing capability
68/100
50/100
Memory capacity
60/100
60/100
Storage capacity
55/100
55/100
Rear camera function
68/100
61/100
Front camera function
50/100
58/100

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" is 73.3mm wide, 146.2mm tall, and 9.7mm thick. The "Wiko Upulse lite" is 72.0mm tall, 144.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick.

There is no real difference between the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

There is no real difference in length or width between the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB"and "Wiko Upulse lite". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB62/10073.3mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm
Wiko Upulse lite67/10072.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.4mm

Which one is easier to hold, "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" weighs 172.0g. The "Wiko Upulse lite" clocks in at 157.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "Wiko Upulse lite" is a lighter phone than the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB", with a difference of approximately 15g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "Wiko Upulse lite" compared to the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB". For this reason, the "Wiko Upulse lite" is recommended.

ScoreWeight
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB61/100172.0g
Wiko Upulse lite67/100157.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" is 5.0inch, and 5.2inch on the "Wiko Upulse lite". The screens of the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDisplay size
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB74/1005.0inch
Wiko Upulse lite77/1005.2inch

Which one has a better display, "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has a 720 x 1280 resolution and a pixel density of 293ppi. The "Wiko Upulse lite", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 282ppi. There is not much of a difference in the pixel resolutions of the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite", so they are about the same in terms of clarity of image and gentleness on the eyes. For this reason it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScorePixel density
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB59/100293ppi
Wiko Upulse lite57/100282ppi

How is the battery duration of "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" different from that of "Wiko Upulse lite" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh, while the "Wiko Upulse lite" has a 3000.0mAh battery. The batteries of both the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite" perform to the same extent. There is also no difference in the battery capacities of the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse lite". Since their battery life is practically identical, it would be better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreBattery capacity
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB62/1002800.0mAh
Wiko Upulse lite65/1003000.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" is equipped with a Exynos 7885 processor, and its performance speed is 1.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Wiko Upulse lite" uses an Cortex-A53 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Wiko Upulse lite". The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Wiko Upulse lite" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" rather than the "Wiko Upulse lite".

ScoreCPU specs
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB68/1001.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Wiko Upulse lite50/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" different from "Wiko Upulse lite" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has 3.0GB of memory. The "Wiko Upulse lite", on the other hand, has 3.0GB. Memory performance is roughly the same for both the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite"; as a result, multitasking, playing 3D games, and using VR feels the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreRAM size
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB60/1003.0GB
Wiko Upulse lite60/1003.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "Wiko Upulse lite" has 32.0GB. There is no real difference between the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB"and "Wiko Upulse lite" 's ROMs and storage capacities, so both can store roughly the same amount of photographs and apps. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreStorage size
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB55/10032.0GB
Wiko Upulse lite55/10032.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has 16.0MP. The "Wiko Upulse lite" has 13.0MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" is higher than the "Wiko Upulse lite", with a difference of approximately 3MP. As a result, the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "Wiko Upulse lite". Therefore, the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" is recommended.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB68/10016.0MP
Wiko Upulse lite61/10013.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

The forward-facing camera on the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB" has a resolution of 5.0MP. The "Wiko Upulse lite"'s has 8.0MP. Comparing the front-facing camera performance, the number of pixels of the front-facing camera on the "Wiko Upulse lite" is higher than the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. For this reason, it is possible to take higher quality selfies and make clear prints with the "Wiko Upulse lite" than the "Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB". Therefore, the "Wiko Upulse lite" is recommended.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB50/1005.0MP
Wiko Upulse lite58/1008.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GBWiko Upulse lite
ImageGalaxy Xcover 4s 32GBWiko Upulse lite
MakerSamsungWiko
ColorGrayblack,gold,deep bleen,cherry red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.3mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm72.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.4mm
Weight172.0g157.0g
Display size5.0inch5.2inch
Display typePLS TFTIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi282ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 7885Cortex-A53
CPU specs1.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Check price

Articles related to Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB
Articles related to Wiko Upulse lite

Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB

Articles related to Galaxy Xcover 4s 32GB
Articles related to Wiko Upulse lite

Wiko Upulse lite

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko Upulse lite

New articles