Compare LG K40S (2019) 32GB vs Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
Created date: 2019-08-27 07:03:37, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:23:16
How did the evaluations between the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has a width of 73.9mm, a length of 156.3mm, and a thickness of 8.6mm. Also, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a width of 80.9mm, a length of 161.7mm, and a thickness of 7.4mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". The "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" excels over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has a large size compared to the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". For that reason the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". That's why we recommend the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 63/100 | 73.9mm x 156.3mm x 8.6mm |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 53/100 | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is about 186.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is about 200.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 14g. For that reason the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 56/100 | 186.0g |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 50/100 | 200.0g |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has a 6.1inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 90/100 | 6.1inch |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 90/100 | 6.0inch |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 275ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 92ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" over the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 55/100 | 275ppi |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 77/100 | 367ppi |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is 3500.0mAh, and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 4000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is recommended over the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "LG K40S (2019) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, with performance measured at 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 88/100 | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 69/100 | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has an 13.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. As a result, the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "LG K40S (2019) 32GB" over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | 71/100 | 13.0MP |
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"LG K40S (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
LG K40S (2019) 32GB | Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | LG | Samsung |
Release date | 2019-09 | 2016-01 |
Color | New Aurora Black/New Moroccan Blue | Pearl White/Midnight Black/Champagne Gold/Pink |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.9mm x 156.3mm x 8.6mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm |
Weight | 186.0g | 200.0g |
Display size | 6.1inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 275ppi | 367ppi |
Battery capacity | 3500.0mAh | 4000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |