Oppo Reno2 F 128GB vs Lava A73 (2017) 8GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-08-29 06:04:39, Updated date: 2022-06-02 17:20:54
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 75.2/100 (The 3260th of all smartphones) | 35.3/100 (The 2851th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 59/100 | 64/100 | ||
Weight | 52/100 | - /100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 74/100 | ||
Display quality | 84/100 | 25/100 | ||
Battery life | 80/100 | 50/100 | ||
Processing power | 92/100 | 14/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 93/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 90/100 | 24/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 97/100 | 27/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 75/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a width of 75.8mm, a length of 162.4mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm. Also, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a width of 72.8mm, a length of 145.5mm, and a thickness of 9.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is a more compact size than the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB". For that reason the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a large size compared to the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB". For that reason the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB". That's why we recommend the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 59/100 | 75.8mm x 162.4mm x 8.7mm |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 64/100 | 72.8mm x 145.5mm x 9.3mm |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 52/100 | 195.0g |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | - /100 |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a 6.5inch display. Also, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a difference of approximately 1.5inch. The "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 90/100 | 6.5inch |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 396ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 201ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 84/100 | 396ppi |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a 2000mAh difference. Since the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70, with performance measured at 2.1GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 92/100 | 2.1GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 14/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a difference of about 7GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a roughly 120GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a roughly 43MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a roughly 11MP difference. As a result, the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" is more suited than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Oppo Reno2 F 128GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Oppo Reno2 F 128GB | Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Oppo | Lava |
Release date | 2019-10 | 2017-02 |
Color | Sky White/Lake Green | Dark Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.8mm x 162.4mm x 8.7mm | 72.8mm x 145.5mm x 9.3mm |
Display size | 6.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | TN |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 396ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
CPU specs | 2.1GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |