Which is better, MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB or IS01 au 3.4GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-02-24 21:23:28, Updated date: 2020-04-04 21:06:29
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", performance comparison
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a width of 70.4mm, a length of 142.8mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm. Also, the "IS01 au 3.4GB" has a width of 83.0mm, a length of 149.0mm, and a thickness of 17.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "IS01 au 3.4GB". The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" excels over the "IS01 au 3.4GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and the "IS01 au 3.4GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a considerably larger size than the "IS01 au 3.4GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 70/100 | 70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 45/100 | 83.0mm x 149.0mm x 17.9mm |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is about 125.0g, and the weight of the "IS01 au 3.4GB" is about 227.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "IS01 au 3.4GB", and there is a difference of about 102g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 80/100 | 125.0g |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 46/100 | 227.0g |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "IS01 au 3.4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and the "IS01 au 3.4GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "IS01 au 3.4GB" is 480 x 960, and pixel density is 214ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has much higher pixel density than the "IS01 au 3.4GB", with a difference of roughly 79ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 33/100 | 214ppi |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 2300.0mAh, and the "IS01 au 3.4GB" is 1400.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has greater battery capacity than the "IS01 au 3.4GB", with a 900mAh difference. Since the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "IS01 au 3.4GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 54/100 | 2300.0mAh |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 32/100 | 1400.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "IS01 au 3.4GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has considerably higher specs than the "IS01 au 3.4GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 14/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 0/100 | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
Want to read it together
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "IS01 au 3.4GB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "IS01 au 3.4GB", with a difference of about 255GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "IS01 au 3.4GB" is 3.4GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "IS01 au 3.4GB", with a roughly 4.6GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 9/100 | 3.4GB |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "IS01 au 3.4GB" has a 5.27MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "IS01 au 3.4GB", with a roughly 2.73MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "IS01 au 3.4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 29/100 | 5.27MP |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera and "IS01 au 3.4GB" has an 0.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "IS01 au 3.4GB", with a roughly 2MP difference. As a result, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is more suited than the "IS01 au 3.4GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "IS01 au 3.4GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
IS01 au 3.4GB | 0/100 | 0.0MP |
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" and "IS01 au 3.4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | IS01 au 3.4GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ||
Brand | MADOSMA | |
Release date | 2015-12-04 | 2010-06-30 |
OS | Windows | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm | 83.0mm x 149.0mm x 17.9mm |
Weight | 125.0g | 227.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS | New ASV |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 480 x 960 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 214ppi |
Battery capacity | 2300.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
Chipset | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 | Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 3.4GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.27MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 0.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |