Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Yezz LIV1 (2019) vs Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2019-09-26 04:45:22, Updated date: 2020-04-04 18:03:22

Yezz LIV1 (2019)Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
Yezz LIV1 (2019)Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Yezz LIV1 (2019)Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
Yezz LIV1 (2019)Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

General rating:

46.6/100

(The 3918th of all smartphones)

71.8/100

(The 44th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
76/100
62/100
Weight
76/100
55/100
Screen size
74/100
90/100
Display quality
33/100
88/100
Battery life
50/100
72/100
Processing power
16/100
91/100
Memory capacity
20/100
90/100
Storage capacity
50/100
67/100
Rear camera performance
27/100
59/100
Front camera performance
15/100
58/100

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", performance comparison

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" has a width of 65.8mm, a length of 138.5mm, and a thickness of 9.5mm. Also, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a width of 74.0mm, a length of 158.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". The "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" excels over the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" over the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is a more compact size than the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". For that reason the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is a considerably larger size than the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is superior to the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" over the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Yezz LIV1 (2019)76/10065.8mm x 138.5mm x 9.5mm
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB62/10074.0mm x 158.0mm x 8.9mm

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is about 133.3g, and the weight of the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is about 187.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", and there is a difference of about 53.6g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is superior to the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" over the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB".

ScoreWeight
Yezz LIV1 (2019)76/100133.3g
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB55/100187.0g

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a 6.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a difference of approximately 1.2inch. The "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreDisplay size
Yezz LIV1 (2019)74/1005.0inch
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB90/1006.2inch

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is 480 x 960, and pixel density is 214ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 530ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a difference of roughly 316ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScorePixel density
Yezz LIV1 (2019)33/100214ppi
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB88/100530ppi

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is 2000.0mAh, and the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 3500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a 1500mAh difference. Since the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreBattery capacity
Yezz LIV1 (2019)50/1002000.0mAh
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB72/1003500.0mAh

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Yezz LIV1 (2019)"'s CPU is a Unisoc SC7731E, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 845 SDM845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreCPU specs
Yezz LIV1 (2019)16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB91/1002.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a difference of about 5GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreRAM size
Yezz LIV1 (2019)20/1001.0GB
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB90/1006.0GB

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" is 16.0GB. Also the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreStorage size
Yezz LIV1 (2019)50/10016.0GB
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB67/10064.0GB

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a 12.2MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a roughly 7.1MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Yezz LIV1 (2019)27/1005.0MP
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB59/10012.2MP

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" has an 2.0MP front camera and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)", with a roughly 6MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is more suited than the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Yezz LIV1 (2019)".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Yezz LIV1 (2019)15/1002.0MP
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB58/1008.0MP

"Yezz LIV1 (2019)" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Yezz LIV1 (2019)Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
ImageYezz LIV1 (2019)Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
MakerYezz
Release date2019-092018-05-18
Colorblack,gun metal,blue,redMidnight Black/Titanium Gray
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)65.8mm x 138.5mm x 9.5mm74.0mm x 158.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight133.3g187.0g
Display size5.0inch6.2inch
Display typeTFTSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 9601440 x 2960
Pixel density214ppi530ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh3500.0mAh
ChipsetUnisoc SC7731ESnapdragon 845 SDM845
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB6.0GB
Storage size16.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP12.2MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP8.0MP

Check price

Articles related to Yezz LIV1 (2019)
Articles related to Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Yezz LIV1 (2019)

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Yezz LIV1 (2019)

Articles related to Yezz LIV1 (2019)
Articles related to Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

New articles