Should you buy Oppo Reno Ace 256GB or Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2019-10-09 15:11:11, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:54:31
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a width of 75.7mm, a length of 161.0mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm. Also, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a width of 68.5mm, a length of 138.0mm, and a thickness of 10.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB". The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" excels over the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" over the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB". The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" excels over the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" over the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is superior to the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" over the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 60/100 | 75.7mm x 161.0mm x 8.7mm |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 70/100 | 68.5mm x 138.0mm x 10.0mm |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is about 200.0g, and the weight of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is about 78.2g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB", and there is a difference of about 121.8g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is superior to the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" over the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 50/100 | 200.0g |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 96/100 | 78.2g |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a 6.5inch display. Also, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a 4.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of approximately 2inch. The "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 90/100 | 6.5inch |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 404ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 854 x 960, and pixel density is 285ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of roughly 119ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 84/100 | 404ppi |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 57/100 | 285ppi |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a 2000mAh difference. Since the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM855 Snapdragon 855+, with performance measured at 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 98/100 | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 6/100 | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 512.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of about 500GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 4.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a roughly 252GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a roughly 43MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is superior to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has an 3.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a roughly 13MP difference. As a result, the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" is more suited than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" over the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
"Oppo Reno Ace 256GB" and "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Oppo Reno Ace 256GB | Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Oppo | Celkon |
Color | Psychedelic Purple/Starry Blue | White/Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.7mm x 161.0mm x 8.7mm | 68.5mm x 138.0mm x 10.0mm |
Weight | 200.0g | 78.2g |
Display size | 6.5inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 854 x 960 |
Pixel density | 404ppi | 285ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |