Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which is better, ZTE Blade 20 128GB or Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB? We compared their features and specs in detail

Created date: 2019-10-17 20:13:22, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:12:08

ZTE Blade 20 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
ZTE Blade 20 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE Blade 20 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
ZTE Blade 20 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image2.9
76.6mm x 162.9mm x 9.0mm
rating-image2.6
80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm
Weightrating-image2.7
190.0g
rating-image2.4
210.0g
Screen sizerating-image4.5
6.49inch
rating-image4.5
6.0inch
Display qualityrating-image2.7
264ppi
rating-image3.9
367ppi
Battery liferating-image4.2
5000.0mAh
rating-image4.2
5000.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image4.3
2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image3.8
1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.5
4.0GB
rating-image3.5
4.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image4.5
128.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.4
16.0MP
rating-image3.4
16.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.9
8.0MP

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a width of 76.6mm, a length of 162.9mm, and a thickness of 9.0mm. Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a width of 80.9mm, a length of 161.7mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason, we recommend the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Blade 20 128GB57/10076.6mm x 162.9mm x 9.0mm
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB52/10080.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is about 190.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is about 210.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 20g. For that reason the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".

ScoreWeight
ZTE Blade 20 128GB54/100190.0g
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB48/100210.0g

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a 6.49inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Blade 20 128GB90/1006.49inch
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB90/1006.0inch

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 720 x 1560, and pixel density is 264ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB", with a difference of roughly 103ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB".

ScorePixel density
ZTE Blade 20 128GB53/100264ppi
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB77/100367ppi

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 5000.0mAh, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 5000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Blade 20 128GB83/1005000.0mAh
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB83/1005000.0mAh

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has higher specs compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Blade 20 128GB85/1002.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB75/1001.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Blade 20 128GB70/1004.0GB
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB70/1004.0GB

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Blade 20 128GB90/100128.0GB
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Blade 20 128GB68/10016.0MP
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB68/10016.0MP

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Blade 20 128GB58/1008.0MP
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB58/1008.0MP

"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Blade 20 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
ImageZTE Blade 20 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
MakerZTESamsung
Release date2019-102016-05
ColorTurquoise/Magic redWhite/Black/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.6mm x 162.9mm x 9.0mm80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm
Weight190.0g210.0g
Display size6.49inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15601080 x 1920
Pixel density264ppi367ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh5000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6771 Helio P60Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB4.0GB
Storage size128.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Blade 20 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

ZTE Blade 20 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade 20 128GB

Articles related to ZTE Blade 20 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

New articles