Which is better, ZTE Blade 20 128GB or vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2019-10-17 21:14:35, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:40:02
How did the evaluations between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a width of 76.6mm, a length of 162.9mm, and a thickness of 9.0mm. Also, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 162.0mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 57/100 | 76.6mm x 162.9mm x 9.0mm |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 59/100 | 77.0mm x 162.0mm x 8.0mm |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is about 190.0g, and the weight of the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is about 199.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 54/100 | 190.0g |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 50/100 | 199.0g |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a 6.49inch display. Also, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a 6.59inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 90/100 | 6.49inch |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 90/100 | 6.59inch |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 720 x 1560, and pixel density is 264ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 1080 x 2316, and pixel density is 387ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB", with a difference of roughly 123ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 53/100 | 264ppi |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 81/100 | 387ppi |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 5000.0mAh, and the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 4000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ZTE Blade 20 128GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.7GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has higher specs compared to the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB". For that reason, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 85/100 | 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 94/100 | 2.7GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 8.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB", with a difference of about 4GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" over the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has a higher pixel count than the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", with a roughly 4MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"ZTE Blade 20 128GB" and "vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ZTE Blade 20 128GB | vivo NEX S (2018) 256GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | vivo |
Release date | 2019-10 | 2018-06 |
Color | Turquoise/Magic red | Black/Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.6mm x 162.9mm x 9.0mm | 77.0mm x 162.0mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 190.0g | 199.0g |
Display size | 6.49inch | 6.59inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1560 | 1080 x 2316 |
Pixel density | 264ppi | 387ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 4000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 8.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |