Vivo Y3 Standard 64GB vs. Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-11-06 20:38:03, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:25:32
How did the evaluations between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 60.6/100 (The 3721th of all smartphones) | 52.9/100 (The 1445th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 57/100 | 60/100 | ||
Weight | 53/100 | 64/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 53/100 | 53/100 | ||
Battery life | 83/100 | 66/100 | ||
Processing power | 71/100 | 53/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 50/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 67/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a width of 76.7mm, a length of 159.4mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 153.0mm, and a thickness of 7.4mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 57/100 | 76.7mm x 159.4mm x 8.9mm |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 60/100 | 77.0mm x 153.0mm x 7.4mm |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is about 191.5g, and the weight of the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is about 165.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB", and there is a difference of about 26.5g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" over the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 53/100 | 191.5g |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 64/100 | 165.0g |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a 6.35inch display. Also, the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 0.84inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" than on the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 90/100 | 6.35inch |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is 720 x 1544, and pixel density is 268ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 53/100 | 268ppi |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is 5000.0mAh, and the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is 3075.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", with a 1925mAh difference. Since the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" over the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 66/100 | 3075.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439, with performance measured at 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" over the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 71/100 | 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 53/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" over the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" over the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB | Oppo A53 (2015) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | Oppo |
Release date | 2019-11 | 2015-12 |
Color | Ink blue/Jade Red | White+Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.7mm x 159.4mm x 8.9mm | 77.0mm x 153.0mm x 7.4mm |
Weight | 191.5g | 165.0g |
Display size | 6.35inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1544 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 3075.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 |
CPU specs | 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |