Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB vs Lava A97 (2016) 8GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2020-02-10 22:49:13, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:00:09
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 80.7/100 (The 3014th of all smartphones) | 41/100 (The 1711th of all smartphones) | ||
Portability | 59/100 | 65/100 | ||
Weight | 46/100 | 66/100 | ||
Size of screen | 91/100 | 74/100 | ||
Screen clarity | 87/100 | 25/100 | ||
Battery duration | 83/100 | 55/100 | ||
Processing capability | 98/100 | 16/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 100/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 95/100 | 24/100 | ||
Rear camera function | 100/100 | 27/100 | ||
Front camera function | 100/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-8.How is "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" different from "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" different from that of "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 76.0mm wide, 166.9mm tall, and 8.8mm thick. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is 72.0mm tall, 145.5mm wide, and 9.2mm thick.
Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For this reason, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is recommended.
Comparing the width and height of the main unit, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". As a result, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is easier to operate with one hand and it is more portable without getting in your way than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". Therefore, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is recommended.
Comparing the overall size of the main unit, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is smaller than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". As a result, it is easier to use the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" with one hand compared to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", and its size makes it more comfortable to carry around. For this reason, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is recommended.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 59/100 | 76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 65/100 | 72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.2mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" weighs 222.0g. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" clocks in at 160.0g. If you compare the weight of the two, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is a considerably lighter smartphone than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", with a difference of about 62g. Because of this, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" puts less of a burden on the fingers and wrists than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". If you want a smartphone that won't tire your hands out even when using it for a long time, we recommend that you buy the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" rather than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 46/100 | 222.0g |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 66/100 | 160.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 6.9inch, and 5.0inch on the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is considerably larger than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 1.9inch. Compared to the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 91/100 | 6.9inch |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Which one has a better display, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a 1440 x 3200 resolution and a pixel density of 508ppi. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 480 x 854 and a pixel density of 195ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 313ppi. The screen on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 87/100 | 508ppi |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
How is the battery duration of "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" different from that of "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh, while the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a 2350.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of 2650mAh. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 55/100 | 2350.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is equipped with a Exynos 990 processor, and its performance speed is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 98/100 | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
How is "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" different from "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 16.0GB of memory. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", on the other hand, has 1.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 15GB. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 16.0GB |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 512.0GB of storage, while the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 504GB. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 95/100 | 512.0GB |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 108.0MP. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 103MP. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is more capable than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 108.0MP |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a resolution of 40.0MP. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"'s has 5.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 35MP. Therefore, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rather than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 40.0MP |
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Lava |
Release date | 2020-03-06 | 2016-09 |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cosmic Black | Black/Gold/Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm | 72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.2mm |
Weight | 222.0g | 160.0g |
Display size | 6.9inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 508ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 2350.0mAh |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 16.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 108.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 40.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |