Which is better, Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB or Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2020-02-10 14:00:53, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:39:04
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 79.4/100 (The 3045th of all smartphones) | 65.4/100 (The 1153th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 65/100 | 60/100 | ||
Weight | 55/100 | 66/100 | ||
Screen size | 91/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 88/100 | 85/100 | ||
Battery life | 81/100 | 65/100 | ||
Processing power | 98/100 | 90/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 99/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 95/100 | 55/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 100/100 | 68/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 64/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a width of 73.7mm, a length of 161.9mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm. Also, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a width of 76.0mm, a length of 153.0mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 65/100 | 73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 60/100 | 76.0mm x 153.0mm x 8.4mm |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is about 188.0g, and the weight of the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is about 160.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB", and there is a difference of about 28g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" over the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 55/100 | 188.0g |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 66/100 | 160.0g |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a 6.7inch display. Also, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 1.2inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" than on the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 91/100 | 6.7inch |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 1440 x 3200, and pixel density is 523ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 88/100 | 523ppi |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 85/100 | 400ppi |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a 1500mAh difference. Since the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 81/100 | 4500.0mAh |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 990, with performance measured at 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20, with performance measured at 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has higher specs compared to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 98/100 | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 90/100 | 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores) |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 8GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is superior to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 512.0GB. Also the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 480GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is superior to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 95/100 | 512.0GB |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 48MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is superior to the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has an 10.0MP front camera and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 2MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 64/100 | 10.0MP |
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Sharp |
Release date | 2020-03-06 | 2016-10 |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cosmic Black | Silver/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm | 76.0mm x 153.0mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 188.0g | 160.0g |
Display size | 6.7inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPS IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 523ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 990 | Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |