Compare Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB vs Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB
Created date: 2020-02-10 22:09:13, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:50:56
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a width of 73.7mm, a length of 161.9mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm. Also, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a width of 76.0mm, a length of 166.9mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 65/100 | 73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 59/100 | 76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is about 188.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is about 222.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", with a difference of about 34g. For that reason the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 55/100 | 188.0g |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 46/100 | 222.0g |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a 6.7inch display. Also, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a 6.9inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 91/100 | 6.7inch |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 91/100 | 6.9inch |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 1440 x 3200, and pixel density is 523ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 1440 x 3200, and pixel density is 508ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 88/100 | 523ppi |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 87/100 | 508ppi |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 5000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 81/100 | 4500.0mAh |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 990, with performance measured at 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 990, with performance measured at 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 98/100 | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 98/100 | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 16.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 16.0GB |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 512.0GB. Also the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 512.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 95/100 | 512.0GB |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 95/100 | 512.0GB |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a 108.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 108.0MP |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has an 10.0MP front camera and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has an 40.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB", with a roughly 30MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" over the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | 64/100 | 10.0MP |
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | 100/100 | 40.0MP |
"Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 2020-03-06 | 2020-03-06 |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cosmic Black | Cosmic Grey/Cosmic Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm | 76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm |
Weight | 188.0g | 222.0g |
Display size | 6.7inch | 6.9inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 1440 x 3200 |
Pixel density | 523ppi | 508ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 990 | Exynos 990 |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 16.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 512.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 108.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 40.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |