Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB vs Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

Created date: 2020-02-10 17:20:47, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:37:11

Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GBGalaxy J3 (2016) 16GB
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GBGalaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

How did the evaluations between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GBGalaxy J3 (2016) 16GB
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB

Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.3
73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm
rating-image3.5
71.0mm x 142.3mm x 7.9mm
Weightrating-image2.8
186.0g
rating-image3.8
138.0g
Screen sizerating-image4.6
6.7inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image4.4
523ppi
rating-image3.0
293ppi
Battery liferating-image4.1
4500.0mAh
rating-image3.0
2600.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image4.8
2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image2.1
1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image4.7
8.0GB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image4.5
128.0GB
rating-image2.5
16.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image5.0
64.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image3.2
10.0MP
rating-image2.5
5.0MP

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", performance comparison

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a width of 73.7mm, a length of 161.9mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm. Also, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a width of 71.0mm, a length of 142.3mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB". For that reason the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a large size compared to the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB". For that reason the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB". That's why we recommend the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB65/10073.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB69/10071.0mm x 142.3mm x 7.9mm

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is about 186.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is about 138.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB", and there is a difference of about 48g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is superior to the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB".

ScoreWeight
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB56/100186.0g
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB75/100138.0g

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a 6.7inch display. Also, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1.7inch. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB91/1006.7inch
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is 1440 x 3200, and pixel density is 523ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 230ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB88/100523ppi
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB59/100293ppi

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 2600.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a 1900mAh difference. Since the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB81/1004500.0mAh
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB59/1002600.0mAh

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 990, with performance measured at 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Spreadtrum SC9830,Exynos 3475 Quad, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB96/1002.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB42/1001.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 6GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB93/1008.0GB
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 112GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB90/100128.0GB
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 56MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB100/10064.0MP
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB50/1008.0MP

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has an 10.0MP front camera and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. As a result, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB64/10010.0MP
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GBGalaxy J3 (2016) 16GB
ImageSamsung Galaxy S20+ 128GBGalaxy J3 (2016) 16GB
MakerSamsungSamsung
Release date2020-03-062016-01
ColorCosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cosmic BlackWhite/Black/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm71.0mm x 142.3mm x 7.9mm
Weight186.0g138.0g
Display size6.7inch5.0inch
Display typeDynamic AMOLED 2XSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 3200720 x 1280
Pixel density523ppi293ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh2600.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 990Spreadtrum SC9830,Exynos 3475 Quad
CPU specs2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB2.0GB
Storage size128.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution64.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution10.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB

Articles related to Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB

New articles