Which should you buy, the Galaxy S20 5G 128GB or Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two
Created date: 2020-02-10 18:26:07, Updated date: 2022-05-31 15:32:59
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
- 1-8.How is "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" different from "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" different from that of "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is 69.1mm wide, 151.7mm tall, and 7.9mm thick. The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" is 70.7mm tall, 143.0mm wide, and 8.6mm thick.
There is no real difference between the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
There is no real difference in length or width between the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB"and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 73/100 | 69.1mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 69/100 | 70.7mm x 143.0mm x 8.6mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" weighs 163.0g. The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" clocks in at 145.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" is a lighter phone than the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB", with a difference of approximately 18g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" compared to the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB". For this reason, the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" is recommended.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 65/100 | 163.0g |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 72/100 | 145.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is 6.2inch, and 5.0inch on the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is considerably larger than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 1.2inch. Compared to the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Which one has a better display, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a 1440 x 3200 resolution and a pixel density of 565ppi. The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 293ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 272ppi. The screen on the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 89/100 | 565ppi |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
How is the battery duration of "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" different from that of "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh, while the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" has a 2500.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of 1500mAh. The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 57/100 | 2500.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is equipped with a Exynos 990 processor, and its performance speed is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" uses an Cortex-A53 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 98/100 | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
How is "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" different from "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has 12.0GB of memory. The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", on the other hand, has 3.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 9GB. The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has 128.0GB of storage, while the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 112GB. The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" and "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has 64.0MP. The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 51MP. The "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is more capable than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" or "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a resolution of 10.0MP. The "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB"'s has 5.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 5MP. Therefore, the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "Galaxy S20 5G 128GB" rather than the "Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | 64/100 | 10.0MP |
Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
Galaxy S20 5G 128GB | Wiko Ufeel (2016) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Wiko |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud Pink | Lime/Space Grey/Chocolate/Slate/Creamy |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 69.1mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm | 70.7mm x 143.0mm x 8.6mm |
Weight | 163.0g | 145.0g |
Display size | 6.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 565ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 990 | Cortex-A53 |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |