Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB vs ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

Created date: 2020-02-26 15:56:31, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:26:51

vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GBZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GBZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

How did the evaluations between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GBZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB

ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.0
60/100
rating-image3.8
75/100
Weightrating-image2.4
47/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Screen sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Display qualityrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image4.3
85/100
Battery liferating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Processing powerrating-image4.9
98/100
rating-image2.3
45/100
Memory capacityrating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Storage capacityrating-image4.6
91/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Rear camera performancerating-image4.9
97/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front camera performancerating-image3.8
75/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", performance comparison

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a width of 74.9mm, a length of 158.5mm, and a thickness of 9.2mm. Also, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has a width of 69.0mm, a length of 139.0mm, and a thickness of 6.6mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB". The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" excels over the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" over the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB". For that reason the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" over the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB60/10074.9mm x 158.5mm x 9.2mm
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB75/10069.0mm x 139.0mm x 6.6mm

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is about 214.5g, and the weight of the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is about 130.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB", and there is a difference of about 84.5g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" over the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB".

ScoreWeight
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB47/100214.5g
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB78/100130.0g

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a 6.44inch display. Also, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1.44inch. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB90/1006.44inch
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 408ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB85/100408ppi
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB85/100440ppi

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is 4400.0mAh, and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is 2300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", with a 2100mAh difference. Since the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB81/1004400.0mAh
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB54/1002300.0mAh

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8928 Snapdragon 400, with performance measured at 1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB98/1002.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB45/1001.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", with a difference of about 10GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB99/10012.0GB
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB91/100256.0GB
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", with a roughly 40MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB97/10048.0MP
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB50/1008.0MP

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", with a roughly 11MP difference. As a result, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is more suited than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB75/10016.0MP
ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GBZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
Imagevivo iQOO 3 5G 256GBZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
MakervivoZTE
Release date2020-03-042014-04
ColorVolcano Orange/Tornado Black/Quantum SilverPink/Black/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.9mm x 158.5mm x 9.2mm69.0mm x 139.0mm x 6.6mm
Weight214.5g130.0g
Display size6.44inch5.0inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 24001080 x 1920
Pixel density408ppi440ppi
Battery capacity4400.0mAh2300.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865Qualcomm MSM8928 Snapdragon 400
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB2.0GB
Storage size256.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
Articles related to ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB

Articles related to vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
Articles related to ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB

New articles