Which should you buy, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB or vivo V3 (2016) 32GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two
Created date: 2020-03-03 13:05:23, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:14:08
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a width of 77.3mm, a length of 168.7mm, and a thickness of 10.4mm. Also, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has a width of 71.0mm, a length of 143.6mm, and a thickness of 7.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB". The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" excels over the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" over the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB". The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" excels over the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" over the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" over the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 54/100 | 77.3mm x 168.7mm x 10.4mm |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 70/100 | 71.0mm x 143.6mm x 7.5mm |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is about 222.0g, and the weight of the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is about 138.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB", and there is a difference of about 84g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" over the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 46/100 | 222.0g |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 75/100 | 138.0g |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a 6.67inch display. Also, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of approximately 1.67inch. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is superior to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 91/100 | 6.67inch |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 394ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 101ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is superior to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 83/100 | 394ppi |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is 4720.0mAh, and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is 2550.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a 2170mAh difference. Since the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 82/100 | 4720.0mAh |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 2550.0mAh |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is superior to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 98/100 | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 61/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 9GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is superior to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 224GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is superior to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 51MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is superior to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has an 20.0MP front camera and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 12MP difference. As a result, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" is more suited than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | 81/100 | 20.0MP |
vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 256GB | vivo V3 (2016) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Xiaomi | vivo |
Release date | 2020-03-06 | 2016-04 |
Color | Lightning Black/Armor Gray/Star Silver | Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.3mm x 168.7mm x 10.4mm | 71.0mm x 143.6mm x 7.5mm |
Weight | 222.0g | 138.0g |
Display size | 6.67inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 394ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4720.0mAh | 2550.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |