Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB or Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2020-04-22 19:36:09, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:02:12

vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GBGalaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GBGalaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GBGalaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB

Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.0
59/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Weightrating-image2.6
51/100
rating-image3.8
75/100
Screen sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Display qualityrating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Battery liferating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Processing powerrating-image4.9
98/100
rating-image2.1
42/100
Memory capacityrating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Storage capacityrating-image4.6
91/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Rear camera performancerating-image4.9
97/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front camera performancerating-image3.8
75/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", performance comparison

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a width of 75.6mm, a length of 163.7mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a width of 71.1mm, a length of 142.4mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". For that reason the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a large size compared to the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". For that reason the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". That's why we recommend the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB59/10075.6mm x 163.7mm x 8.9mm
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB69/10071.1mm x 142.4mm x 8.0mm

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is about 198.1g, and the weight of the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is about 138.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB", and there is a difference of about 60g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" over the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB".

ScoreWeight
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB51/100198.1g
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB75/100138.0g

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a 6.57inch display. Also, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1.57inch. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB90/1006.57inch
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is 1080 x 2408, and pixel density is 401ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 108ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB84/100401ppi
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB59/100293ppi

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is 2600.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a 1900mAh difference. Since the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB81/1004500.0mAh
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB59/1002600.0mAh

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Spreadtrum SC8830, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB98/1002.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB42/1001.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 10GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB99/10012.0GB
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB91/100256.0GB
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 40MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB97/10048.0MP
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB50/1008.0MP

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 11MP difference. As a result, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB75/10016.0MP
Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GBGalaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
Imagevivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GBGalaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
MakervivoSamsung
Release date2020-04-292016-07
ColorBlue/Black+Dark BlueSilver/Black/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.6mm x 163.7mm x 8.9mm71.1mm x 142.4mm x 8.0mm
Weight198.1g138.0g
Display size6.57inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2408720 x 1280
Pixel density401ppi293ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh2600.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865Spreadtrum SC8830
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB2.0GB
Storage size256.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
Articles related to Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB

vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB

Articles related to vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
Articles related to Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB

Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB

New articles