Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo X50 Lite 128GB vs Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

Created date: 2020-05-11 13:41:16

vivo X50 Lite 128GBGalaxy A7 (2017) 32GB
vivo X50 Lite 128GBGalaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

How did the evaluations between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

vivo X50 Lite 128GBGalaxy A7 (2017) 32GB
vivo X50 Lite 128GB

Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

General rating:

75.8/100

(The 3216th of all smartphones)

66.7/100

(The 1126th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
60/100
58/100
Weight
55/100
56/100
Screen size
90/100
85/100
Display quality
84/100
81/100
Battery life
81/100
74/100
Processing power
91/100
86/100
Memory capacity
93/100
60/100
Storage capacity
90/100
55/100
Rear camera performance
97/100
68/100
Front camera performance
75/100
75/100

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", performance comparison

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a width of 75.2mm, a length of 159.3mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm. Also, the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" has a width of 77.6mm, a length of 156.8mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo X50 Lite 128GB60/10075.2mm x 159.3mm x 8.7mm
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB58/10077.6mm x 156.8mm x 7.9mm

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is about 186.7g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" is about 186.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
vivo X50 Lite 128GB55/100186.7g
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB56/100186.0g

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a 6.38inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" has a 5.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", with a roughly 0.67inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" than on the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB".

ScoreDisplay size
vivo X50 Lite 128GB90/1006.38inch
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB85/1005.7inch

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 403ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 386ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo X50 Lite 128GB84/100403ppi
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB81/100386ppi

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" is 3600.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", with a 900mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is recommended over the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo X50 Lite 128GB81/1004500.0mAh
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB74/1003600.0mAh

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 7880, with performance measured at 1.9GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has higher specs compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". For that reason, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo X50 Lite 128GB91/1002.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB86/1001.9GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", with a difference of about 5GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
vivo X50 Lite 128GB93/1008.0GB
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB60/1003.0GB

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo X50 Lite 128GB90/100128.0GB
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", with a roughly 32MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo X50 Lite 128GB97/10048.0MP
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB68/10016.0MP

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" has an 16.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo X50 Lite 128GB75/10016.0MP
Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB75/10016.0MP

"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo X50 Lite 128GBGalaxy A7 (2017) 32GB
Imagevivo X50 Lite 128GBGalaxy A7 (2017) 32GB
MakervivoSamsung
Release date2020-05-122017-01
ColorNebula Blue/Jade BlackBlack Sky/Gold Sand/Blue Mist and Peach Cloud
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.2mm x 159.3mm x 8.7mm77.6mm x 156.8mm x 7.9mm
Weight186.7g186.0g
Display size6.38inch5.7inch
Display typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 23401080 x 1920
Pixel density403ppi386ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh3600.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665Exynos 7880
CPU specs2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.9GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB3.0GB
Storage size128.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo X50 Lite 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

vivo X50 Lite 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo X50 Lite 128GB

Articles related to vivo X50 Lite 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy A7 (2017) 32GB

New articles