Vivo X50 Lite 128GB vs. ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2020-05-11 15:33:43
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", performance comparison
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a width of 75.2mm, a length of 159.3mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm. Also, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a width of 78.5mm, a length of 171.7mm, and a thickness of 9.7mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". For that reason, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". For that reason, we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is a more compact size than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". For that reason the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a large size compared to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". For that reason the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". That's why we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 60/100 | 75.2mm x 159.3mm x 8.7mm |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 53/100 | 78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is about 186.7g, and the weight of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is about 215.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", with a difference of about 28.3g. For that reason the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 55/100 | 186.7g |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 47/100 | 215.0g |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a 6.38inch display. Also, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 6.65inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 90/100 | 6.38inch |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 91/100 | 6.65inch |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 403ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 387ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 84/100 | 403ppi |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 81/100 | 387ppi |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 5000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 81/100 | 4500.0mAh |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, with performance measured at 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has higher specs compared to the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB". For that reason, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" over the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 91/100 | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 98/100 | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 12.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has more RAM than the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB", with a difference of about 4GB. For that reason the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" allows for smoother multitasking than the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB", and apps are less likely to crash. In addition the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" allows for smoother enjoyment of 3D games and VR. For this reason, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has an 16.0MP front camera and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has an 16.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
"vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | ZTE |
Release date | 2020-05-12 | 2019-09 |
Color | Nebula Blue/Jade Black | Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.2mm x 159.3mm x 8.7mm | 78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm |
Weight | 186.7g | 215.0g |
Display size | 6.38inch | 6.65inch |
Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 387ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 12.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 48.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 16.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |