Should you buy vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB or BQ Aquaris X2 64GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2020-05-31 12:54:13, Updated date: 2020-07-31 16:20:49
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", performance comparison
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a width of 72.8mm, a length of 158.5mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm. Also, the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" has a width of 72.3mm, a length of 150.7mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 66/100 | 72.8mm x 158.5mm x 8.0mm |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 66/100 | 72.3mm x 150.7mm x 8.3mm |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is about 181.5g, and the weight of the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is about 163.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB", with a difference of about 18.5g. For that reason the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" over the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 57/100 | 181.5g |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 65/100 | 163.0g |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a 6.56inch display. Also, the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" has a 5.65inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a larger screen compared to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", with a roughly 0.9inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" than on the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 90/100 | 6.56inch |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 84/100 | 5.65inch |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is 1080 x 2376, and pixel density is 397ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is 1080 x 2160, and pixel density is 427ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 84/100 | 397ppi |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 85/100 | 427ppi |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is 4315.0mAh, and the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is 3100.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", with a 1215mAh difference. Since the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" over the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 80/100 | 4315.0mAh |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 66/100 | 3100.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is superior to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" over the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 98/100 | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 77/100 | 1.8GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", with a difference of about 8GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is superior to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" over the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", with a roughly 192GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is superior to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" over the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a 50.0MP main camera. Also, "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", with a roughly 38MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is superior to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" over the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 98/100 | 50.0MP |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has an 32.0MP front camera and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", with a roughly 24MP difference. As a result, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is more suited than the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" over the "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | 97/100 | 32.0MP |
BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris X2 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | BQ Aquaris X2 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | BQ |
Release date | 2020-07-11 | 2018-06 |
Color | Blue/Brown | Carbon Black/Sand Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.8mm x 158.5mm x 8.0mm | 72.3mm x 150.7mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 181.5g | 163.0g |
Display size | 6.56inch | 5.65inch |
Display type | AMOLED | LTPS IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2376 | 1080 x 2160 |
Pixel density | 397ppi | 427ppi |
Battery capacity | 4315.0mAh | 3100.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 50.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |