Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB vs BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2020-06-04 19:47:32, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:00:10
How did the evaluations between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | |||
General rating: | 62.4/100 (The 3666th of all smartphones) | 62.3/100 (The 251th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 59/100 | 59/100 | ||
Weight | 54/100 | 55/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 53/100 | 53/100 | ||
Battery life | 80/100 | 80/100 | ||
Processing power | 75/100 | 88/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 67/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 68/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 81/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", performance comparison
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a width of 75.7mm, a length of 161.9mm, and a thickness of 9.1mm. Also, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has a width of 76.8mm, a length of 160.0mm, and a thickness of 8.2mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 59/100 | 75.7mm x 161.9mm x 9.1mm |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 59/100 | 76.8mm x 160.0mm x 8.2mm |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is about 189.4g, and the weight of the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is about 188.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 54/100 | 189.4g |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 55/100 | 188.0g |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a 6.4inch display. Also, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 90/100 | 6.4inch |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 90/100 | 6.0inch |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is 720 x 1560, and pixel density is 268ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is 720 x 1440, and pixel density is 268ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 53/100 | 268ppi |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 53/100 | 268ppi |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is 4010.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 80/100 | 4010.0mAh |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6757 Helio P20, with performance measured at 2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" over the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 75/100 | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 88/100 | 2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" over the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" over the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has an 20.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB", with a roughly 12MP difference. As a result, the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" is more suited than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB" over the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | 81/100 | 20.0MP |
"Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | BLU Vivo X (2018) 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Motorola | BLU |
Release date | 2020-06-12 | 2018-02 |
Color | Pearl White | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.7mm x 161.9mm x 9.1mm | 76.8mm x 160.0mm x 8.2mm |
Weight | 189.4g | 188.0g |
Display size | 6.4inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1560 | 720 x 1440 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 268ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 4010.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | Mediatek MT6757 Helio P20 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 20.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |