Compare Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB vs Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
Created date: 2020-06-04 20:41:39, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:48:42
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
- 1-8.How is "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" different from "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" different from that of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is 75.7mm wide, 161.9mm tall, and 9.1mm thick. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 79.0mm tall, 146.0mm wide, and 8.7mm thick.
Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". For this reason, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is recommended.
Comparing the width and height of the main unit, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is smaller and more compact than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". As a result, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is easier to operate with one hand and it is more portable without getting in your way than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". Therefore, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is recommended.
When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB"and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 59/100 | 75.7mm x 161.9mm x 9.1mm |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 54/100 | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" weighs 189.4g. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" clocks in at 168.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a lighter phone than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB", with a difference of approximately 21.4g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" compared to the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". For this reason, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 54/100 | 189.4g |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 63/100 | 168.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is 6.4inch, and 5.7inch on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Comparing the size of the display and screen, the screen size of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is larger than that of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", with a difference of approximately 0.7inch. As a result, there will be unintended touches on the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" compared to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and it is possible to enjoy games and videos on a large screen. For this reason, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 90/100 | 6.4inch |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
Which one has a better display, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a 720 x 1560 resolution and a pixel density of 268ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a pixel density of 386ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB", with a difference of about 118ppi. The screen on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 53/100 | 268ppi |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 81/100 | 386ppi |
How is the battery duration of "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" different from that of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh, while the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 3000.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", with a difference of 1000mAh. The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 processor, and its performance speed is 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses an Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 CPU that performs at a speed of 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). There is also no real discrepancy between the CPU performances of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Because of this, both phones will feel practically identical in terms of smoothness when running apps and ease of game play. This is why it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 75/100 | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 73/100 | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
How is "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" different from "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has 3.0GB of memory. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", on the other hand, has 3.0GB. Memory performance is roughly the same for both the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"; as a result, multitasking, playing 3D games, and using VR feels the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB. There is no real difference between the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB"and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" 's ROMs and storage capacities, so both can store roughly the same amount of photographs and apps. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has 16.0MP. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 13.0MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is higher than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. As a result, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Therefore, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" or "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"'s has 1.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", with a difference of about 7MP. Therefore, the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 5/100 | 1.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
Motorola Moto G Fast 32GB | Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Motorola | Sharp |
Release date | 2020-06-12 | 2015-07 |
Color | Pearl White | Black/White/Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.7mm x 161.9mm x 9.1mm | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm |
Weight | 189.4g | 168.0g |
Display size | 6.4inch | 5.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | S-PureLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1560 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 386ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 1.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |