Compare Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB vs BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB
Created date: 2020-06-04 14:16:14
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", performance comparison
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a width of 72.5mm, a length of 159.6mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" has a width of 76.7mm, a length of 155.3mm, and a thickness of 7.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". For that reason, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 67/100 | 72.5mm x 159.6mm x 7.6mm |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 60/100 | 76.7mm x 155.3mm x 7.5mm |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is about 172.0g, and the weight of the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is about 154.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB", with a difference of about 18g. For that reason the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" over the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 61/100 | 172.0g |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 68/100 | 154.0g |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a 6.55inch display. Also, the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a larger screen compared to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 1.04inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" than on the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 90/100 | 6.55inch |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 401ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 134ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 84/100 | 401ppi |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is 3150.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a 850mAh difference. Since the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 67/100 | 3150.0mAh |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G, with performance measured at 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6753, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 95/100 | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 58/100 | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 10GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 35MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has an 32.0MP front camera and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 27MP difference. As a result, the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" is more suited than the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | 97/100 | 32.0MP |
BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB" and "BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G 256GB | BLU Vivo XL (2016) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Oppo | BLU |
Release date | 2020-06-12 | 2016-01 |
Color | Black/White/Blue/Pink/Green | Gold/Silver/Blue/Pink |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.5mm x 159.6mm x 7.6mm | 76.7mm x 155.3mm x 7.5mm |
Weight | 172.0g | 154.0g |
Display size | 6.55inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 401ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3150.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G | Mediatek MT6753 |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |