Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB vs vivo U20 (2019) 64GB
Created date: 2020-06-04 13:15:30
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | |||
General rating: | 80/100 (The 3028th of all smartphones) | 70.1/100 (The 3456th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 64/100 | 58/100 | ||
Weight | 57/100 | 53/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 85/100 | 83/100 | ||
Battery life | 80/100 | 83/100 | ||
Processing power | 94/100 | 89/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 93/100 | 90/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 91/100 | 67/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 97/100 | 68/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 97/100 | 75/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", performance comparison
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a width of 74.0mm, a length of 159.3mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm. Also, the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" has a width of 76.5mm, a length of 162.2mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". For that reason, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 64/100 | 74.0mm x 159.3mm x 7.8mm |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 58/100 | 76.5mm x 162.2mm x 8.9mm |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is about 183.0g, and the weight of the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" is about 193.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 57/100 | 183.0g |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 53/100 | 193.0g |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a 6.43inch display. Also, the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" has a 6.53inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 90/100 | 6.43inch |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 90/100 | 6.53inch |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 409ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 394ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 85/100 | 409ppi |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 83/100 | 394ppi |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" is 5000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G, with performance measured at 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 94/100 | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 89/100 | 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", with a roughly 192GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is superior to the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" over the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", with a roughly 32MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is superior to the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" over the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has an 32.0MP front camera and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" has an 16.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", with a roughly 16MP difference. As a result, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is more suited than the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" over the "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | 97/100 | 32.0MP |
vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
"Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "vivo U20 (2019) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | vivo U20 (2019) 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Oppo | vivo |
Release date | 2020-06-12 | 2019-11 |
Color | Black/Blue/Purple | Racing Black/Blaze Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.0mm x 159.3mm x 7.8mm | 76.5mm x 162.2mm x 8.9mm |
Weight | 183.0g | 193.0g |
Display size | 6.43inch | 6.53inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2340 |
Pixel density | 409ppi | 394ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 16.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |