Which is better, OnePlus Nord or Nokia 3.2? We compared their features and specs in detail

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The OnePlus Nord has a width of 2.9 inches (73.3 mm), a length of 6.2 inches (158.3 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (8.2 mm). Also, the Nokia 3.2 has a width of 3 inches (76.2 mm), a length of 6.3 inches (159.4 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (8.6 mm).

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the OnePlus Nord is smaller and more compact compared to the Nokia 3.2. For that reason, the OnePlus Nord is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the Nokia 3.2. For that reason, we recommend the OnePlus Nord.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the OnePlus Nord and the Nokia 3.2. For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the OnePlus Nord and the Nokia 3.2. For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the OnePlus Nord is about 184 oz (184 g), and the weight of the Nokia 3.2 is about 181 oz (181 g). Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the OnePlus Nord and Nokia 3.2. That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The OnePlus Nord has a 6.44 inch display. Also, the Nokia 3.2 has a 6.26 inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the OnePlus Nord and the Nokia 3.2. As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the OnePlus Nord is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 408 ppi. Also, the resolution on the Nokia 3.2 is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 268 ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the OnePlus Nord has much higher pixel density than the Nokia 3.2, with a difference of roughly 140 ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the OnePlus Nord is superior to the Nokia 3.2. If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the OnePlus Nord over the Nokia 3.2.

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The OnePlus Nord is 4115 mAh, and the Nokia 3.2 is 4000 mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the OnePlus Nord and Nokia 3.2. Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The OnePlus Nord's CPU is a Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G, with performance measured at 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore). Also, the Nokia 3.2's CPU is a Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429, with performance measured at 1.8GHz×4(Quad core). Comparing CPU performance, the OnePlus Nord has considerably higher specs than the Nokia 3.2. In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the OnePlus Nord is superior to the Nokia 3.2. If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the OnePlus Nord over the Nokia 3.2.

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the OnePlus Nord is 12GB and the weight of the Nokia 3.2 is 3GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the OnePlus Nord has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the Nokia 3.2, with a difference of about 9GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the OnePlus Nord is superior to the Nokia 3.2. If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the OnePlus Nord over the Nokia 3.2.

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the OnePlus Nord is 256GB. Also the Nokia 3.2 is 32GB. Regarding storage capacity, the OnePlus Nord has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the Nokia 3.2, with a roughly 224GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the OnePlus Nord is superior to the Nokia 3.2. If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the OnePlus Nord over the Nokia 3.2.

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

OnePlus Nord has a 48 MP main camera. Also, Nokia 3.2 has a 13 MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the OnePlus Nord has a much higher pixel count compared to the Nokia 3.2, with a roughly 35 MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the OnePlus Nord is superior to the Nokia 3.2. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the OnePlus Nord over the Nokia 3.2.

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

OnePlus Nord has an 32 MP front camera and Nokia 3.2 has an 5 MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the OnePlus Nord has a much higher pixel count compared to the Nokia 3.2, with a roughly 27 MP difference. As a result, the OnePlus Nord is more suited than the Nokia 3.2 for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the OnePlus Nord over the Nokia 3.2.