ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB vs ARROWS S EM01F 32GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2020-07-23 15:07:19
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", performance comparison
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a width of 78.0mm, a length of 171.0mm, and a thickness of 9.9mm. Also, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a width of 65.0mm, a length of 129.0mm, and a thickness of 10.8mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB". The "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" excels over the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" over the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB". The "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" excels over the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" over the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is superior to the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" over the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 53/100 | 78.0mm x 171.0mm x 9.9mm |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 75/100 | 65.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is about 240.0g, and the weight of the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is about 151.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB", and there is a difference of about 89g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is superior to the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" over the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 44/100 | 240.0g |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 69/100 | 151.0g |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a 6.59inch display. Also, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a 4.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a difference of approximately 1.88inch. The "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 90/100 | 6.59inch |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 69/100 | 4.7inch |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 391ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 312ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has much higher pixel density than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a difference of roughly 79ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 82/100 | 391ppi |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 64/100 | 312ppi |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is 6000.0mAh, and the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 2420.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a 3580mAh difference. Since the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 86/100 | 6000.0mAh |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 56/100 | 2420.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865+, with performance measured at 3.1GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 99/100 | 3.1GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 42/100 | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is 16.0GB and the weight of the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a difference of about 14GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 100/100 | 16.0GB |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is 512.0GB. Also the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a roughly 480GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 95/100 | 512.0GB |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has a 13.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a roughly 50.9MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is superior to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 61/100 | 13.1MP |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has an 24.0MP front camera and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" has an 0.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", with a roughly 24MP difference. As a result, the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" is more suited than the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" over the "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | 86/100 | 24.0MP |
ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | 0/100 | 0.0MP |
"ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB" and "ARROWS S EM01F 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ROG Phone 3 ZS661KS 512GB | ARROWS S EM01F 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Asus | |
Release date | 2020-08-22 | 2013-08-20 |
Color | Black Glare | / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.0mm x 171.0mm x 9.9mm | 65.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm |
Weight | 240.0g | 151.0g |
Display size | 6.59inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | AMOLED | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 391ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 6000.0mAh | 2420.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865+ | Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 |
CPU specs | 3.1GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 16.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 24.0MP | 0.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |