Which is better, Galaxy M01s or Galaxy S20 5G? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 07/26/2020, 04:51:25, Updated date: 07/26/2020, 13:37:13
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Galaxy M01s | Galaxy S20 5G | |||
![]() Compare with another product | ![]() Compare with another product | |||
General rating: | 59.9/100 (The 613th of all smartphones) | 84.9/100 (The 4th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 61/100 | 73/100 | ||
Weight | 63/100 | 65/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 54/100 | 89/100 | ||
Battery life | 80/100 | 80/100 | ||
Processing power | 73/100 | 98/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 99/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 90/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 100/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 64/100 |
Contents
- 1.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, performance comparison
- 1-0.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which has a clearer display?
- 1-6.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which has more data storage?
- 1-8.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which has better CPU?
- 1-10.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2.Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, performance comparison
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The Galaxy M01s has a width of 3.0 inches (75.8 mm), a length of 6.2 inches (156.9 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (7.8 mm). Also, the Galaxy S20 5G has a width of 2.7 inches (69.1 mm), a length of 6.0 inches (151.7 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (7.9 mm).
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the Galaxy S20 5G is considerably smaller and more compact than the Galaxy M01s. The Galaxy S20 5G excels over the Galaxy M01s in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the Galaxy S20 5G over the Galaxy M01s.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the Galaxy M01s and the Galaxy S20 5G. For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the Galaxy S20 5G has a large size compared to the Galaxy M01s. For that reason the Galaxy S20 5G is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the Galaxy M01s. That's why we recommend the Galaxy S20 5G.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 61/100 | 3.0 inches (75.8 mm) x 6.2 inches (156.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) |
Galaxy S20 5G | 73/100 | 2.7 inches (69.1 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.9 mm) |
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the Galaxy M01s is about 168 oz (168 g), and the weight of the Galaxy S20 5G is about 163 oz (163 g). Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G. That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 63/100 | 168 oz (168 g) |
Galaxy S20 5G | 65/100 | 163 oz (163 g) |
Want to read it together
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The Galaxy M01s has a 6.2 inch display. Also, the Galaxy S20 5G has a 6.2 inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the Galaxy M01s and the Galaxy S20 5G. As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 90/100 | 6.2 inch |
Galaxy S20 5G | 90/100 | 6.2 inch |
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the Galaxy M01s is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 271 ppi. Also, the resolution on the Galaxy S20 5G is 1440 x 3200, and pixel density is 565 ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the Galaxy S20 5G has much higher pixel density than the Galaxy M01s, with a difference of roughly 294 ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the Galaxy S20 5G is superior to the Galaxy M01s. If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the Galaxy S20 5G over the Galaxy M01s.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 54/100 | 271 ppi |
Galaxy S20 5G | 89/100 | 565 ppi |
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The Galaxy M01s is 4000 mAh, and the Galaxy S20 5G is 4000 mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G. Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 80/100 | 4000 mAh |
Galaxy S20 5G | 80/100 | 4000 mAh |
Want to read it together
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The Galaxy M01s's CPU is a Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(OctaCore). Also, the Galaxy S20 5G's CPU is a Exynos 990, with performance measured at 2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(OctaCore). Comparing CPU performance, the Galaxy S20 5G has considerably higher specs than the Galaxy M01s. In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the Galaxy S20 5G is superior to the Galaxy M01s. If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the Galaxy S20 5G over the Galaxy M01s.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 73/100 | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(OctaCore) |
Galaxy S20 5G | 98/100 | 2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(OctaCore) |
Want to read it together
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the Galaxy M01s is 3GB and the weight of the Galaxy S20 5G is 12GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the Galaxy S20 5G has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the Galaxy M01s, with a difference of about 9GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the Galaxy S20 5G is superior to the Galaxy M01s. If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the Galaxy S20 5G over the Galaxy M01s.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 60/100 | 3GB |
Galaxy S20 5G | 99/100 | 12GB |
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the Galaxy M01s is 32GB. Also the Galaxy S20 5G is 128GB. Regarding storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 5G has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the Galaxy M01s, with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the Galaxy S20 5G is superior to the Galaxy M01s. If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the Galaxy S20 5G over the Galaxy M01s.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 55/100 | 32GB |
Galaxy S20 5G | 90/100 | 128GB |
Want to read it together
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Galaxy M01s has a 13 MP main camera. Also, Galaxy S20 5G has a 64 MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the Galaxy S20 5G has a much higher pixel count compared to the Galaxy M01s, with a roughly 51 MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the Galaxy S20 5G is superior to the Galaxy M01s. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the Galaxy S20 5G over the Galaxy M01s.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 61/100 | 13 MP |
Galaxy S20 5G | 100/100 | 64 MP |
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Galaxy M01s has an 8 MP front camera and Galaxy S20 5G has an 10 MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the Galaxy S20 5G has a higher pixel count than the Galaxy M01s, with a roughly 2 MP difference. As a result, the Galaxy S20 5G is better able to take high quality selfies than the Galaxy M01s, and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the Galaxy S20 5G.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy M01s | 58/100 | 8 MP |
Galaxy S20 5G | 64/100 | 10 MP |
Want to read it together
Detailed comparison of Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G
Comparison for general rating
Image | Product name | Review | general rating | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 59.9 | Color:Light Blue/Gray, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.8 mm) x 6.2 inches (156.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm), Weight:168 oz (168 g), Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1520, Pixel density:271 ppi, Display size:6.2 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, CPU specs:2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:3GB, Storage size:32GB, Battery capacity:4000 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:13 MP, Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
![]() | 84.9 | Color:Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud Pink/Cloud White/Aura Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69.1 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.9 mm), Weight:163 oz (163 g), Display type:Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 3200, Pixel density:565 ppi, Display size:6.2 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 990, CPU specs:2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:12GB, Storage size:128GB, Battery capacity:4000 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:64 MP, Front-camera resolution:10 MP |
Comparison for body size
Image | Product name | Review | body size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 52.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.8 mm) x 6.2 inches (156.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) | |||||
![]() | 59.1 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69.1 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.9 mm) |
Comparison for body weight
Image | Product name | Review | body weight | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 63.2 | Weight:168 oz (168 g) | |||||
![]() | 65.2 | Weight:163 oz (163 g) |
Comparison for screen size
Image | Product name | Review | screen size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 90.3 | Display size:6.2 inch | |||||
![]() | 90.3 | Display size:6.2 inch |
Comparison for screen resolution
Image | Product name | Review | screen resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 47.4 | ||||||
![]() | 97.7 |
Comparison for RAM capacity
Image | Product name | Review | RAM capacity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 60.0 | RAM size:3GB | |||||
![]() | 99.0 | RAM size:12GB |
Comparison for storage size
Image | Product name | Review | storage size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 55.5 | Storage size:32GB | |||||
![]() | 90.0 | Storage size:128GB |
Comparison for battery
Image | Product name | Review | battery | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 80.0 | Battery capacity:4000 mAh | |||||
![]() | 80.0 | Battery capacity:4000 mAh |
Comparison for rear-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | rear-camera resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | |||||
![]() | 100.0 | Rear-camera resolution:64 MP |
Comparison for front-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | front-camera resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 58.3 | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
![]() | 64.2 | Front-camera resolution:10 MP |
Comparison for grip
Image | Product name | Review | grip | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 57.6 | Color:Light Blue/Gray, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.8 mm) x 6.2 inches (156.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm), Weight:168 oz (168 g) | |||||
![]() | 62.1 | Color:Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud Pink/Cloud White/Aura Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69.1 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.9 mm), Weight:163 oz (163 g) |
Comparison for screen cleanliness
Image | Product name | Review | screen cleanliness | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 54.7 | Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1520, Pixel density:271 ppi | |||||
![]() | 89.3 | Display type:Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 3200, Pixel density:565 ppi |
Comparison for performance
Image | Product name | Review | performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 73.0 | OS:Android, Chipset:Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, CPU specs:2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:3GB | |||||
![]() | 98.1 | OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 990, CPU specs:2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:12GB |
Galaxy M01s and Galaxy S20 5G, performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy M01s | Galaxy S20 5G | |
Image | ![]() | ![]() |
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 7/16, 2020 | 3/6, 2020 |
Color | Light Blue/Gray | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud Pink/Cloud White/Aura Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 3.0 inches (75.8 mm) x 6.2 inches (156.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) | 2.7 inches (69.1 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.9 mm) |
Weight | 168 oz (168 g) | 163 oz (163 g) |
Display size | 6.2 inch | 6.2 inch |
Display type | PLS TFT | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 1440 x 3200 |
Pixel density | 271 ppi | 565 ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Exynos 990 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(OctaCore) | 2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(OctaCore) |
RAM size | 3GB | 12GB |
Storage size | 32GB | 128GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13 MP | 64 MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8 MP | 10 MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |