ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB vs Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB
Created date: 2020-07-27 17:53:56, Updated date: 2022-06-22 22:34:33
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", performance comparison
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a width of 78.0mm, a length of 168.6mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm. Also, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" has a width of 62.9mm, a length of 117.5mm, and a thickness of 12.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB". The "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" excels over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB". The "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" excels over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is superior to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 53/100 | 78.0mm x 168.6mm x 9.8mm |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 77/100 | 62.9mm x 117.5mm x 12.0mm |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is about 220.0g, and the weight of the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is about 130.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB", and there is a difference of about 90g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is superior to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" over the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 47/100 | 220.0g |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 78/100 | 130.0g |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a 6.65inch display. Also, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" has a 3.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a difference of approximately 3.15inch. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is superior to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 91/100 | 6.65inch |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 387ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a difference of roughly 223ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is superior to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 81/100 | 387ppi |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 11/100 | 164ppi |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is 1400.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a 3100mAh difference. Since the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 81/100 | 4500.0mAh |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 32/100 | 1400.0mAh |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6571, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is superior to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 98/100 | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 6/100 | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is 16.0GB and the weight of the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a difference of about 240GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is superior to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 100/100 | 16.0GB |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a roughly 256GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is superior to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a roughly 62MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is superior to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 5/100 | 2.0MP |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" has an 3.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", with a roughly 5MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is more suited than the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" over the "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
"ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB | Spice Smart Flo 359 (Mi-359) 512MB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | Spice |
Release date | 2020-08-01 | 2014-08 |
Color | Silver/Pulse | Titanium Grey/Silver |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.0mm x 168.6mm x 9.8mm | 62.9mm x 117.5mm x 12.0mm |
Weight | 220.0g | 130.0g |
Display size | 6.65inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 387ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Mediatek MT6571 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 16.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 2.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |