Compare Nokia 3.4 vs Meizu 16s Pro
Created date: 10/06/2020, 07:58:55, Updated date: 10/06/2020, 08:11:12
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro, or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Nokia 3.4 | Meizu 16s Pro | |||
![]() Compare with another product | ![]() Compare with another product | |||
General rating: | ||||
Portability | ![]() 59/100 | ![]() 66/100 | ||
Weight | ![]() 58/100 | ![]() 63/100 | ||
Size of screen | ![]() 90/100 | ![]() 90/100 | ||
Screen clarity | ![]() 53/100 | ![]() 84/100 | ||
Battery duration | ![]() - /100 | ![]() 74/100 | ||
Processing capability | ![]() 79/100 | ![]() 96/100 | ||
Memory capacity | ![]() 70/100 | ![]() 93/100 | ||
Storage capacity | ![]() 67/100 | ![]() 91/100 | ||
Rear camera function | ![]() 61/100 | ![]() 97/100 | ||
Front camera function | ![]() 58/100 | ![]() 81/100 |
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro. Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro. Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
- 1-8.How is Nokia 3.4 different from Meizu 16s Pro in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of Nokia 3.4 different from that of Meizu 16s Pro ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro. Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The Nokia 3.4 is 3.0 inches (76 mm) wide, 6.3 inches (161 mm) tall, and 0.3 inches (8.7 mm) thick. The Meizu 16s Pro is 2.9 inches (73.4 mm) tall, 6.0 inches (151.9 mm) wide, and 0.3 inches (7.7 mm) thick.
Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the Meizu 16s Pro is smaller and more compact compared to the Nokia 3.4. Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the Meizu 16s Pro than the Nokia 3.4. For this reason, the Meizu 16s Pro is recommended.
There is no real difference in length or width between the Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro, so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Comparing the overall size of the main unit, the Meizu 16s Pro is smaller than the Nokia 3.4. As a result, it is easier to use the Meizu 16s Pro with one hand compared to the Nokia 3.4, and its size makes it more comfortable to carry around. For this reason, the Meizu 16s Pro is recommended.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 59/100 | 3.0 inches (76 mm) x 6.3 inches (161 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.7 mm) |
Meizu 16s Pro | 66/100 | 2.9 inches (73.4 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.7 mm) |
Which one is easier to hold, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The Nokia 3.4 weighs 180 oz (180 g). The Meizu 16s Pro clocks in at 166 oz (166 g). Comparing the weight of the main unit, the Meizu 16s Pro is a lighter phone than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of approximately 166 oz (14 g). Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the Meizu 16s Pro compared to the Nokia 3.4. For this reason, the Meizu 16s Pro is recommended.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 58/100 | 180 oz (180 g) |
Meizu 16s Pro | 63/100 | 166 oz (166 g) |
Which is better in terms of display, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the Nokia 3.4 is 6.39 inch, and 6.2 inch on the Meizu 16s Pro. The screens of the Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 90/100 | 6.39 inch |
Meizu 16s Pro | 90/100 | 6.2 inch |
Which one has a better display, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the Nokia 3.4 has a 720 x 1560 resolution and a pixel density of 268 ppi. The Meizu 16s Pro, on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1080 x 2232 and a pixel density of 399 ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the Meizu 16s Pro has a much higher pixel density than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of about 131 ppi. The screen on the Meizu 16s Pro is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the Nokia 3.4. If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the Meizu 16s Pro rather than the Nokia 3.4.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 53/100 | 268 ppi |
Meizu 16s Pro | 84/100 | 399 ppi |
How is the battery duration of Nokia 3.4 different from that of Meizu 16s Pro ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | - /100 | |
Meizu 16s Pro | 74/100 | 3600 mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The Nokia 3.4 is equipped with a Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 processor, and its performance speed is 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore). The Meizu 16s Pro uses an Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ CPU that performs at a speed of 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(OctaCore). Comparing CPU performance, the Meizu 16s Pro has significantly higher specs than the Nokia 3.4. The Meizu 16s Pro proves to be more advanced than the Nokia 3.4 in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the Meizu 16s Pro rather than the Nokia 3.4.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 79/100 | 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) |
Meizu 16s Pro | 96/100 | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(OctaCore) |
How is Nokia 3.4 different from Meizu 16s Pro in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The Nokia 3.4 has 4GB of memory. The Meizu 16s Pro, on the other hand, has 8GB. As for memory performance, the Meizu 16s Pro has a larger memory capacity than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of about 4GB. The Meizu 16s Pro has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the Nokia 3.4. If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the Meizu 16s Pro rather than the Nokia 3.4.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 70/100 | 4GB |
Meizu 16s Pro | 93/100 | 8GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The Nokia 3.4 has 64GB of storage, while the Meizu 16s Pro has 256GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the Meizu 16s Pro has a much larger capacity than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of about 192GB. The Meizu 16s Pro can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the Nokia 3.4. If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the Meizu 16s Pro rather than the Nokia 3.4.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 67/100 | 64GB |
Meizu 16s Pro | 91/100 | 256GB |
Compare the rear cameras of Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro. Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the Nokia 3.4 has 13 MP. The Meizu 16s Pro has 48 MP. The rear-facing camera of the Meizu 16s Pro also has a higher pixel count than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of about 35 MP. The Meizu 16s Pro is more capable than the Nokia 3.4 of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the Meizu 16s Pro rather than the Nokia 3.4.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 61/100 | 13 MP |
Meizu 16s Pro | 97/100 | 48 MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, Nokia 3.4 or Meizu 16s Pro?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the Nokia 3.4 has a resolution of 8 MP. The Meizu 16s Pro's has 20 MP. The front-facing camera of the Meizu 16s Pro has a significantly higher number of pixels than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of about 12 MP. Therefore, the Meizu 16s Pro is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the Nokia 3.4. If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the Meizu 16s Pro rather than the Nokia 3.4.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Nokia 3.4 | 58/100 | 8 MP |
Meizu 16s Pro | 81/100 | 20 MP |
Read on the same page
Detailed comparison of Nokia 3.4 and Meizu 16s Pro
Comparison for body size
Image | Product name | Review | body size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (76 mm) x 6.3 inches (161 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.7 mm) | ||||||
55.3 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73.4 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.7 mm) |
Comparison for body weight
Image | Product name | Review | body weight | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
58.4 | Weight:180 oz (180 g) | ||||||
64.0 | Weight:166 oz (166 g) |
Comparison for screen size
Image | Product name | Review | screen size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.7 | Display size:6.39 inch | ||||||
90.3 | Display size:6.2 inch |
Comparison for screen resolution
Image | Product name | Review | screen resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
48.3 | |||||||
73.7 |
Comparison for RAM capacity
Image | Product name | Review | RAM capacity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
70.0 | RAM size:4GB | ||||||
93.4 | RAM size:8GB |
Comparison for storage size
Image | Product name | Review | storage size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
67.0 | Storage size:64GB | ||||||
91.5 | Storage size:256GB |
Comparison for rear-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | rear-camera resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | ||||||
97.8 | Rear-camera resolution:48 MP |
Comparison for front-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | front-camera resolution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
58.3 | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | ||||||
81.0 | Front-camera resolution:20 MP |
Comparison for grip
Image | Product name | Review | grip | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
54.2 | Color:Fjord/Dusk/Charcoal, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (76 mm) x 6.3 inches (161 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.7 mm), Weight:180 oz (180 g) | ||||||
59.7 | Color:Twilight Forest/Dream Unicorn/Black Mirror/White story, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73.4 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.7 mm), Weight:166 oz (166 g) |
Comparison for screen cleanliness
Image | Product name | Review | screen cleanliness | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
54.0 | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1560, Pixel density:268 ppi | ||||||
84.8 | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2232, Pixel density:399 ppi |
Comparison for performance
Image | Product name | Review | performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.9 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460, CPU specs:1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:4GB | ||||||
96.8 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, CPU specs:2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB |
Compare Performance Specs
Nokia 3.4 | Meizu 16s Pro | |
Image | ![]() | ![]() |
Maker | Nokia | Meizu |
Release date | 10/22, 2020 | 8, 2019 |
Color | Fjord/Dusk/Charcoal | Twilight Forest/Dream Unicorn/Black Mirror/White story |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 3.0 inches (76 mm) x 6.3 inches (161 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.7 mm) | 2.9 inches (73.4 mm) x 6.0 inches (151.9 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.7 mm) |
Weight | 180 oz (180 g) | 166 oz (166 g) |
Display size | 6.39 inch | 6.2 inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1560 | 1080 x 2232 |
Pixel density | 268 ppi | 399 ppi |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(OctaCore) |
RAM size | 4GB | 8GB |
Storage size | 64GB | 256GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13 MP | 48 MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8 MP | 20 MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |