All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Nokia 3.4 vs Google Pixel 5

Created date: 10/06/2020, 17:48:42, Updated date: 10/06/2020, 21:34:33

Nokia 3.4Google Pixel 5
Nokia 3.4Google Pixel 5

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Nokia 3.4Google Pixel 5
Nokia 3.4

Google Pixel 5

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.0
59/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Weightrating-image2.9
58/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Screen sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Display qualityrating-image2.7
53/100
rating-image4.3
85/100
Battery liferating-image
- /100
rating-image
- /100
Processing powerrating-image4.0
79/100
rating-image4.7
94/100
Memory capacityrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image4.7
93/100
Storage capacityrating-image3.4
67/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.4
68/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
58/100
rating-image2.9
58/100

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, performance comparison

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5 size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The Nokia 3.4 has a width of 3.0inches (76mm), a length of 6.3inches (161mm), and a thickness of 0.3inches (8.7mm). Also, the Google Pixel 5 has a width of 2.8inches (70.4mm), a length of 5.7inches (144.7mm), and a thickness of 0.3inches (8mm).

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the Google Pixel 5 is considerably smaller and more compact than the Nokia 3.4. The Google Pixel 5 excels over the Nokia 3.4 in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the Google Pixel 5 over the Nokia 3.4.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the Google Pixel 5 is a more compact size than the Nokia 3.4. For that reason the Google Pixel 5 has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the Google Pixel 5.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the Google Pixel 5 has a large size compared to the Nokia 3.4. For that reason the Google Pixel 5 is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the Nokia 3.4. That's why we recommend the Google Pixel 5.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Nokia 3.459/1003.0inches (76mm) x 6.3inches (161mm) x 0.3inches (8.7mm)
Google Pixel 570/1002.8inches (70.4mm) x 5.7inches (144.7mm) x 0.3inches (8mm)

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the Nokia 3.4 is about 6.3oz (180g), and the weight of the Google Pixel 5 is about 5.3oz (151g). Comparing the weight of the two devices, the Google Pixel 5 is a considerably lighter smart phone than the Nokia 3.4, and there is a difference of about 1oz (151g). In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the Google Pixel 5 is superior to the Nokia 3.4. If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the Google Pixel 5 over the Nokia 3.4.

ScoreWeight
Nokia 3.458/1006.3oz (180g)
Google Pixel 569/1005.3oz (151g)

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The Nokia 3.4 has a 6.39 inch display. Also, the Google Pixel 5 has a 6 inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the Nokia 3.4 and the Google Pixel 5. As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Nokia 3.490/1006.39 inch
Google Pixel 590/1006 inch

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the Nokia 3.4 is 720 x 1560, and pixel density is 268ppi. Also, the resolution on the Google Pixel 5 is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 429ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the Google Pixel 5 has much higher pixel density than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of roughly 161ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the Google Pixel 5 is superior to the Nokia 3.4. If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the Google Pixel 5 over the Nokia 3.4.

ScorePixel density
Nokia 3.453/100268ppi
Google Pixel 585/100429ppi

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

ScoreBattery capacity
Nokia 3.4 - /100
Google Pixel 5 - /100

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The Nokia 3.4's CPU is a Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore). Also, the Google Pixel 5's CPU is a Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G, with performance measured at 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore). Comparing CPU performance, the Google Pixel 5 has considerably higher specs than the Nokia 3.4. In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the Google Pixel 5 is superior to the Nokia 3.4. If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the Google Pixel 5 over the Nokia 3.4.

ScoreCPU specs
Nokia 3.479/1001.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore)
Google Pixel 594/1002.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore)

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the Nokia 3.4 is 4GB and the weight of the Google Pixel 5 is 8GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the Google Pixel 5 has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the Nokia 3.4, with a difference of about 4GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the Google Pixel 5 is superior to the Nokia 3.4. If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the Google Pixel 5 over the Nokia 3.4.

ScoreRAM size
Nokia 3.470/1004GB
Google Pixel 593/1008GB

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the Nokia 3.4 is 64GB. Also the Google Pixel 5 is 128GB. Regarding storage capacity, the Google Pixel 5 has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the Nokia 3.4, with a roughly 64GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the Google Pixel 5 is superior to the Nokia 3.4. If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the Google Pixel 5 over the Nokia 3.4.

ScoreStorage size
Nokia 3.467/10064GB
Google Pixel 590/100128GB

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5 rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

Nokia 3.4 has a 13 MP main camera. Also, Google Pixel 5 has a 16 MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the Google Pixel 5 has a higher pixel count than the Nokia 3.4, with a roughly 3 MP difference. As a result, the Google Pixel 5 is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the Nokia 3.4, and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the Google Pixel 5.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Nokia 3.461/10013 MP
Google Pixel 568/10016 MP

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

Nokia 3.4 has an 8 MP front camera and Google Pixel 5 has an 8 MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5 have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Nokia 3.458/1008 MP
Google Pixel 558/1008 MP

Nokia 3.4 and Google Pixel 5, performance comparison by specification sheet

Nokia 3.4Google Pixel 5
ImageNokia 3.4Google Pixel 5
MakerNokiaGoogle
Release date10/22, 202010/15, 2020
ColorFjord/Dusk/CharcoalJust Black/Sorta Sage
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)3.0inches (76mm) x 6.3inches (161mm) x 0.3inches (8.7mm)2.8inches (70.4mm) x 5.7inches (144.7mm) x 0.3inches (8mm)
Weight6.3oz (180g)5.3oz (151g)
Display size6.39 inch6 inch
Display typeIPS LCDOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15601080 x 2340
Pixel density268ppi429ppi
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G
CPU specs1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore)2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore)
RAM size4GB8GB
Storage size64GB128GB
Rear-camera resolution13 MP16 MP
Front-camera resolution8 MP8 MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Smartphone ranking

Category

The 15

The 16

The 17

New articles