Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB vs Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2021-01-21 19:44:43

vivo Y20G (2021) 128GBNokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GBNokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

vivo Y20G (2021) 128GBNokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB

Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB

General rating:

65.5/100

(The 4740th of all smartphones)

58/100

(The 3782th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
59/100
59/100
Weight
53/100
58/100
Screen size
90/100
90/100
Display quality
54/100
53/100
Battery life
- /100
80/100
Processing power
89/100
57/100
Memory capacity
90/100
60/100
Storage capacity
90/100
55/100
Rear camera performance
61/100
61/100
Front camera performance
58/100
50/100

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", performance comparison

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has a width of 76.3mm, a length of 164.4mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm. Also, the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" has a width of 76.2mm, a length of 159.4mm, and a thickness of 8.6mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB59/10076.3mm x 164.4mm x 8.4mm
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB59/10076.2mm x 159.4mm x 8.6mm

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is about 192.3g, and the weight of the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" is about 181.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB53/100192.3g
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB58/100181.0g

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has a 6.51inch display. Also, the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" has a 6.26inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB90/1006.51inch
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB90/1006.26inch

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is 720 x 1600, and pixel density is 269ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 268ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB54/100269ppi
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB53/100268ppi

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB - /100
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB80/1004000.0mAh

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek Helio G80, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429, with performance measured at 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" over the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB89/1002.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB57/1001.8GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is 6.0GB and the weight of the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", with a difference of about 3GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" over the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB90/1006.0GB
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB60/1003.0GB

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" over the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB90/100128.0GB
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB61/10013.0MP
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB61/10013.0MP

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB58/1008.0MP
Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB50/1005.0MP

"vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB" and "Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo Y20G (2021) 128GBNokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB
Imagevivo Y20G (2021) 128GBNokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB
MakervivoNokia
Release date2021-01-192019-06
ColorPurist Blue/Obsidian BlackBlack/Steel
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.3mm x 164.4mm x 8.4mm76.2mm x 159.4mm x 8.6mm
Weight192.3g181.0g
Display size6.51inch6.26inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1600720 x 1520
Pixel density269ppi268ppi
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
CPU specs2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB3.0GB
Storage size128.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB
Articles related to Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB

vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB

Articles related to vivo Y20G (2021) 128GB
Articles related to Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB

Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Nokia 3.2 (2019) 32GB

New articles