Galaxy A52 5G 256GB vs Galaxy S9 Active 64GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2021-03-16 15:58:13
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a width of 75.1mm, a length of 159.9mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 61/100 | 75.1mm x 159.9mm x 8.4mm |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | - /100 |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 54/100 | 189.0g |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | - /100 |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a 6.5inch display. Also, the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" has a 5.8inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 90/100 | 6.5inch |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 86/100 | 5.8inch |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 404ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 567ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 84/100 | 404ppi |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 89/100 | 567ppi |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | - /100 | |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G, with performance measured at 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 92/100 | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 89/100 | 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", with a difference of about 4GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", with a roughly 192GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a 64.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", with a roughly 52MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 100/100 | 64.0MP |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has an 32.0MP front camera and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", with a roughly 24MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | 97/100 | 32.0MP |
Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Galaxy A52 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Active 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy A52 5G 256GB | Galaxy S9 Active 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Color | Awesome Black/Awesome White/Awesome Violet/Awesome Blue | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple |
OS | Android | Android |
Display size | 6.5inch | 5.8inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 404ppi | 567ppi |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |