Which is better, Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB or ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-02-24 22:42:37, Updated date: 2020-04-04 22:32:39
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" has a width of 73.0mm, a length of 160.0mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm. Also, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" has a width of 77.7mm, a length of 158.98mm, and a thickness of 8.95mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 65/100 | 73.0mm x 160.0mm x 8.3mm |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 56/100 | 77.7mm x 158.98mm x 8.95mm |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is about 173.0g, and the weight of the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is about 170.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 61/100 | 173.0g |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 62/100 | 170.0g |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" has a 6.2inch display. Also, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" has a 5.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" than on the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 530ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 515ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 88/100 | 530ppi |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 87/100 | 515ppi |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is 3500.0mAh, and the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is 3300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 69/100 | 3300.0mAh |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 835 MSM8998, with performance measured at 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 821, with performance measured at 2.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 88/100 | 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 84/100 | 2.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" over the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" has a 12.2MP main camera. Also, "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" has a 23.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB", with a roughly 10.8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" over the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 59/100 | 12.2MP |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 85/100 | 23.0MP |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB" and "ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy S8+ SCV35 au 64GB | ZenFone AR ZS571KL 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ASUS | |
Brand | Galaxy | ZenFone |
Release date | 2017-06-08 | 2017-06-23 |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.0mm x 160.0mm x 8.3mm | 77.7mm x 158.98mm x 8.95mm |
Weight | 173.0g | 170.0g |
Display size | 6.2inch | 5.7inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2960 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 530ppi | 515ppi |
Battery capacity | 3500.0mAh | 3300.0mAh |
Chipset | Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 | Snapdragon 821 |
CPU specs | 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.2MP | 23.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |