Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB vs GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-02-24 23:27:17, Updated date: 2020-04-04 23:08:13

Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GBGALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GBGALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GBGALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB

GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB

General rating:

72.1/100

(The 39th of all smartphones)

52.7/100

(The 536th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
71/100
67/100
Weight
65/100
74/100
Screen size
86/100
70/100
Display quality
89/100
62/100
Battery life
65/100
51/100
Processing power
89/100
45/100
Memory capacity
70/100
50/100
Storage capacity
67/100
55/100
Rear camera performance
59/100
50/100
Front camera performance
58/100
14/100

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", performance comparison

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a width of 69.0mm, a length of 148.0mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm. Also, the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" has a width of 71.0mm, a length of 137.0mm, and a thickness of 9.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is a more compact size than the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB". For that reason the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB71/10069.0mm x 148.0mm x 8.8mm
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB67/10071.0mm x 137.0mm x 9.4mm

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is about 161.0g, and the weight of the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is about 139.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB", with a difference of about 22g. For that reason the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" over the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB".

ScoreWeight
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB65/100161.0g
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB74/100139.0g

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a 5.8inch display. Also, the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" has a 4.8inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB86/1005.8inch
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB70/1004.8inch

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 567ppi. Also, the resolution on the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 305ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a difference of roughly 262ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScorePixel density
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB89/100567ppi
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB62/100305ppi

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is 2100.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a 900mAh difference. Since the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB65/1003000.0mAh
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB51/1002100.0mAh

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 845 SDM845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 4412, with performance measured at 1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB89/1002.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB45/1001.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB70/1004.0GB
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB50/1002.0GB

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB67/10064.0GB
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB55/10032.0GB

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a 12.2MP main camera. Also, "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" has a 8.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a roughly 4.1MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB59/10012.2MP
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB50/1008.1MP

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" has an 1.9MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", with a roughly 6.1MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" is more suited than the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" over the "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB58/1008.0MP
GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB14/1001.9MP

"Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB" and "GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GBGALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB
ImageGalaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GBGALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB
Maker
BrandGalaxyGalaxy
Release date2018-05-182012-12-05
ColorTitanium Gray/Midnight Black/Lilac PurpleTitanium Gray/Sapphire Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)69.0mm x 148.0mm x 8.8mm71.0mm x 137.0mm x 9.4mm
Weight161.0g139.0g
Display size5.8inch4.8inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDEL
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 2960720 x 1280
Pixel density567ppi305ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2100.0mAh
ChipsetSnapdragon 845 SDM845Exynos 4412
CPU specs2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.2MP8.1MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP1.9MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB
Articles related to GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB

Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB

Articles related to Galaxy S9 SC-02K docomo 64GB
Articles related to GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB

GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as GALAXY S III SC-03E docomo 32GB

New articles