Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB vs Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965
Created date: 2021-03-22 15:14:29
How did the evaluations between the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", performance comparison
- 1-0."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", performance comparison
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" has a width of 76.8mm, a length of 165.3mm, and a thickness of 9.4mm. Also, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a width of 73.4mm, a length of 155.1mm, and a thickness of 8.1mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a large size compared to the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB". For that reason the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB". That's why we recommend the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 56/100 | 76.8mm x 165.3mm x 9.4mm |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 65/100 | 73.4mm x 155.1mm x 8.1mm |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" is about 215.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is about 189.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is a lighter smart phone than the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB", with a difference of about 26g. For that reason the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" over the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 47/100 | 215.0g |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 54/100 | 189.0g |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" has a 6.67inch display. Also, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a 6.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 91/100 | 6.67inch |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 394ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 530ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 83/100 | 394ppi |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 88/100 | 530ppi |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | - /100 | |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, with performance measured at 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965"'s CPU is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 96/100 | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 91/100 | 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Want to read it together
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", with a roughly 36MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" has an 20.0MP front camera and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", with a roughly 12MP difference. As a result, the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | 81/100 | 20.0MP |
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", performance comparison by specification sheet
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 256GB | Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965 | |
Image | ||
Maker | Xiaomi | Samsung |
Release date | 2021-03-24 | 2018-03-16 |
Color | Phantom Black/Frost Blue/Metal Bronze | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.8mm x 165.3mm x 9.4mm | 73.4mm x 155.1mm x 8.1mm |
Weight | 215.0g | 189.0g |
Display size | 6.67inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Infinity Display Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 394ppi | 530ppi |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone |